Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Ojective and subjective factors of the development of a model of states management in Ukraine

189
1
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

The author’s view of peculiarities of both the models of state’s management in the postSoviet space and the reasons underlying their formation is present ed. The specificity of the strengthening of the presidentcentrism in Ukraine is shown. It is emphasized that the presidentcentric model is mainly oriented to the interests of the bureaucracy and is not adequate to the increasing influence of the great business on political processes.

  1. Vydrin, D., Tabachnyk, D. (1995). Ukraina na porozi XXI stolittia: politychnyi aspekt. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian]

  2. Vyshniak, O. (2007). Vid avtorytarnoho prezydentsializmu do parlamentskoi demokratii. Politychnyi menedzhment, 3 (24). URL: http://www.politik.org.ua/vid/magcontent.php3?m=1&n=70&c=1619 [in Ukrainian]

  3. Voloshchuk, V. (2006). Shliakhy rozvytku parlamentu Ukrainy v period transformatsii. In O.Yu. Obolenskyi, V.M. Kniaziev (Eds.), Problemy transformatsii systemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia v umovakh politychnoi reformy v Ukraini (pp. 200-203). Kyiv: Vydavnitstvo NADU [in Ukrainian]

  4. Hrytsiak, I.A. (2003). Formy pravlinnia i stabilnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia. In I.V. Rozputenko (Ed.), Parlamentsko-prezydentska systema upravlinnia: Ukraina ta nimetskyi dosvid (pp. 29-43). Kyiv: K.I.S. [in Ukrainian]

  5. Karmazina, M. (2005). Deiaki osoblyvosti prezydentstva na postradianskomu prostori (1991–2004 rr.) Politychnyi menedzhment, 3 (12). URL: http://www.politik.org.ua/vid/magcontent.php3?m=1&n=40&c=781 [in Ukrainian]

  6. Klyamkin, I.M. (1993). Kakoi avtoritarnyi rezhim vozmozhen segodnya v Rossii? Polis, 5, 50-54 [in Russian]

  7. Kryvenko, L.T. (2000). Konstytutsiini modeli lehitymatsii hlavy derzhavy i balans povnovazhen mizh instytutamy vlady. Viche, 9, 19-37 [in Ukrainian]

  8. Kuras, I. (2003). Mizh avtorytarnym mynulym i demokratychnym maibutnim. Naukovi zapysky, 22, 18-24. Kyiv: IPiEND [in Ukrainian]

  9. Melnychenko, V.I. (2005). Improving the system of public governance: a subjective vision and objective needs. Ukr. socìumUkrainian Society, 2-3 (7-8), 88-99 [in Ukrainian]

  10. Melnychenko, V.I., Plakhotniuk, N.H. (2006). Status uriadu v konteksti konstytutsiinoi reformy: mozhlyvist zrobyty pershyi krok do samostiinosti. Viche, 1-2, 29-33 [in Ukrainian]

  11. Nyzhnyk, N.R., Melnychenko, V.I. (2003). Konstytutsiini zminy v Ukraini yak pravova peredumova politychnoi reformy. In V.I. Luhoviy, V.M. Kniazev (Eds.), Politichna reforma – harantiia demokratychnoho rozvytku ukrainskoho susplstva (pp. 17-26). Kyiv: Vydavnitsvo UADU [in Ukrainian]

  12. Nozdrachev, A.F. (1996). Osnovnye kharakteristiki ispolnitelnoi vlasti po Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii 1993 g. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 1, 12-23 [in Russian]

  13. Lazareva, V.V. (Ed.). (1996). Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva. Moskva: Yurist [in Russian]

  14. Pavlenko, R. (2002). Parlament i uriad. Yak optymizuvaty mekhanizm vidnosyn. Viche, 4, 7-13 [in Ukrainian]

  15. Plakhotniuk, N.H., Melnychenko, V.I. (2005). Povnovazhennia Prezydenta Ukrainy u konteksti konstytutsiinoi reformy: struktura, zmist, kharakter. Biuleten Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy, 12, 5-15 [in Ukrainian]

  16. Rebkalo, V.A. (2003). Etapy stanovlennia, dynamika ta priorytety politychnoi reformy v Ukraini. In I.V. Rozputenko (Ed.), Parlamentsko-prezydentska systema upravlinnia. Ukraina ta nimetskyi dosvid (pp. 44-58).  Kyiv: K.I.S. [in Ukrainian]

  17. Tymoshenko proponuie Yushenku stvoryty shyrku. (2008). Ukrainska pravda. URL: http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2008/5/28/76628.htm [in Ukrainian]

  18. Shkliar, L. (2003). Politychna reforma v Ukraini. Naukovi zapysky, 22, 18-24. Kyiv: IPiEND [in Ukrainian]

Full text