Article authors

  • Nikitina T. Ye.
    Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
    12, Shovkovychna Str., Kyiv, 01021, Ukraine
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sociology

Correlation between concepts of validity and reliability

Ukr. socìum, 2009, 4(31): 25-32
Language:
Ukrainian
https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2009.04.025
394
3
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

In the Ukrainian Sociology there are two parallel “traditions” of sociological measurement as a whole and evaluation of the validity and reliability in particular – “Soviet” tradition and “Western”. This article shows the ratio of the terms of “Soviet” and “Western” traditions and the only and most expedient, from the author’s point of view, the terminological apparatus was suggested. Also the ratio of content of the concepts of validity and reliability is considered.

  1. Volovich, V.I. (1974). Nadezhnost informatsii v sotsiologicheskom issledovanii: problemy metodologii i metodiki. Kiev [in Russian]

  2. Devyatko, I.F. (2002). Metody sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya. Moskva [in Russian]

  3. Dembitskyi, S. (2008). Teoretychna validnist vymiriuvalnoi protsedury i zmishchennia danykh u sotsiolohichnomu doslidzhenni. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing – Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 3, 99-118 [in Ukrainian]

  4. Doktorov, B.Z. (1979). O nadezhnosti izmereniya v sotsiologicheskom issledovanii. Lvov [in Russian]

  5. Zdravomyslov, A.G. (1969). Metodologiya i protsedura sotsiologicheskikh issledovanii. Moskva: Mysl [in Russian]

  6. Panina, N.V. (2008). Izbrannye trudy po sotsiologii. Voprosy teorii, metodologii, tekhnologii sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya i professionalnoi etiki. Kiev: Fakt [in Russian]

  7. Panyna, N.V. (1996). Tekhnolohiia sotsiolohichnoho doslidzhennia. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka [in Ukrainian]

  8. Paniotto, V.I. (1986). Kachestvo sotsiologicheskoi informatsii: metody otsenki i protsedury obespecheniya. Kiev [in Russian]

  9. Saganenko, G.I. (1983). Nadezhnost rezultatov sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya. Lvov [in Russian]

  10. Golovakha, Ye., Gorbachyk, A., Liubyva, T. ta in. (2008). Subiektyvna nadiinist: teoriia i metody vymiriuvannia (ISN). Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing – Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 1, 166-188 [in Ukrainian]

  11. Yadov, V.A. (1972). Sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie: metodologiya, programma, metody. Moskva [in Russian]

  12. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. (1985). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.

  13. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. (1999). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.

  14. American Psychological Association. Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals. (1966). Washington, DC.

  15. American Psychological Association. Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals. (1974). Washington.

  16. American Psychological Association. (1954). Technical recommendations for psychological tests and Diagnostic techniques. Psychological Bulletin, 51 (2), 2, 1-38.

    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053479

  17. Bohrnsted, G.W. (2000) Validity. Encyclopedia of Sociology, Second Edition, 5. New York.

  18. Carmines, E.G., Zeller, R.A. (1980). Measurement in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.

  19. Carmines, E.G., Zeller, R.A. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverley Hills: Sage.

    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985642

  20. Cronbach, L.J., Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct Validity in Psychological Tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.

    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957

  21. Sage Handbook of social research methods (2008).

Full text