Article authors

  • Andrushenko A. I.
    PhD. in Sociology
    associate professor of the department of economics and entrepreneurship
    Kryvy Rih Metallurgical Institute of the State University "Kryvy Rih National University"
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sociology

The development of sociological conception concerning the notion of trust

Ukr. socìum, 2009, 4(31): 7-15
Language:
Ukrainian
https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2009.04.007
388
2
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

The features of the formation of sociological conception regarding the mechanism of establishment of trust relationships as a kind of social relations in different periods of time are revealed, points of view of well-known sociologists to study the concept of “trust” are disclosed, that are particularly presented in the writings of E. Diurkgeim, F. Tonis, M. Weber, G . Zimmel, P. Shtompka, R.D. Patnam, E. Giddens, D. Kouman, D. Gambetti, A. Seligmen, Sh.N. Eisenstadt, and many others.

  1. Dyurkgeim, E. (1996). Metod sotsiologii. Zapadno-evropeiskaya sotsiologiya XIX – nachala XX vekov. Moskva: Nauka [in Russian]

  2. Tennis, F. (2002). Obshchnost i obshchestvo. In S.P. Bankovskaya (Ed.), Teoreticheskaya sotsiologiya (pp. 216-248). Moskva: Knizhnyi Dom Universitet [in Russian]

  3. Veber, M. (1998). Pro deiaki katehorii sotsiolohii rozuminnia. In Sotsiolohiia. Zahalnoistorychni analizy. Polityka (pp. 104-156). Kyiv [in Ukrainian]

  4. Zimmel, G. (2002). Kak vozmozhno obshchestvo? Obshchenie. Primer chistoi ili formalnoi sotsiologii. In S.P. Bankovskaya (Ed.), Teoreticheskaya sotsiologiya (pp. 314-333). Moskva: Knizhnyi Dom Universitet [in Russian]

  5. Shtompka, P. (1996). Sotsiologiya sotsialnykh izmenenii. Moskva: Aspekt Press [in Russian]

  6. Patnam, R. (2001). Tvorennia demokratii: tradytsii hromadianskoi aktyvnosti v suchasnii Italii. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian]

  7. Seligmen, A. (2002). Problema doveriya. Moskva: Ideya-Press [in Russian]

  8. Shveri, R. (1996). Teoreticheskaya kontseptsiya Dzheimsa Koumana. Sotsiologicheskii Zhurnal, 1-2. URL: www.ecsoc.ru/images/pub_ecsoc/2004/08/14/0000010372/19_studyprog.pdf [in Russian]

  9. Portnov, A. (2007). Mafiya bessmertna? Ekspeditsiya XXI, 2 (64). URL: http://www.exp21.com.ua/special/64-5.htm [in Russian]

  10. Luman, N. (2004). Obshchestvo obshchestva. Obshchestvo kak sotsialnaya sistema. Moskva: Logos [in Russian]

  11. Barber, B. (1972). Struktura sotsialnoi stratifikatsii i tendentsii sotsialnoi mobilnosti. In Amerikanskaya sotsiologiya: perspektivy, problemy, metody (pp. 235-247). Moskva: Progress [in Russian]

  12. Aizenshtadt, Sh.N. (1993). Konstruktivnye elementy velikikh revolyutsii: kultura, sotsialnaya struktura, istoriya i chelovecheskaya deyatelnost. THESIS. Teoriya i istoriya ekonomicheskikh i sotsialnykh institutov i sistem, 2, 207-208 [in Russian]

  13. Sobolieva, N.I. (2002). Sotsiolohiia subiektyvnoi realnosti. Kyiv: Instytut sotsiolohii NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian]

  14. Sviezhentseva, Yu.O. (2006). Shcho take partnerstvo i yak yoho vymiriuvaty: kontseptualne ta operatsionalne vyznachennia sotsialnoho fenomenu ta shliakhy yoho empirychnoho vyvchennia. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing – Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 2, 133-148 [in Ukrainian]

  15. Silin, A. (2001). Mify i byl sotsialnogo partnerstva v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i na Zapade. Upravlenie personalom, 1, 227-228 [in Russian]

  16. Taran, Yu. Dovira yak natsionalna ideia. URL: http://dialogs.org.ua/project_ua_full.php [in Ukrainian]

Full text