Article authors

  • Salnikova S. A.
    senior lecturer, department of sociology
    Volyn National University named after Lesia Ukraink
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sociology

Constructing the content, characteristics and levels of measuring the religiosity (according to empirical sociological research)

Ukr. socìum, 2010, 4(35): 108-119
Language:
Ukrainian
https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2010.04.108
659
6
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

The article analyzes the religion as a multilevel notion is at the level of its content, at the level of quantitative indicators of religiosity, as well as correlations with other indicators. Results of maintence of multilevel approach to the measurement of religiosity based on empirical data of sociological study in Lutsk.

  1. Parashchevin, M. (2009). Relihiia ta relihiinist v Ukraini. Kyiv: Instytut polityky, Institut sotsiolohii NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian]

  2. Glock, Ch.Y., Stark, R. (1973). Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago, New York, San Francisco, London: Rand McNally&Company.

  3. Faulkner, J.E., Dejong, G.F. (1966). Religiosity in 5-D: An empirical analysis. Social Forces, 45, 246-254.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/2574395

  4. King, M. (1967). Measuring the Religious Variable. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion, 6, 173-190.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1384044

  5. King, M., Hunt, R. (1975). Measuring the Religious Variable: Natural Replication. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion, 14, 13-22.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1384452

  6. Yinger, M.J. (1969). A Structural examination of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 8, 88-99.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1385257

  7. Kuhre, B. E., & Yinger, J. M. (1971). The Scientific Study of Religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 10(1), 52.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1385321

  8. Yinger, M.J. (1977). A comparative study of the substructures of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 16, 67-86.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1386206

  9. Salnikova, S.A. (2008). Osnovni pidkhody do vymiriuvannia relihiinosti. In Naukovi studii Lvivskoho sotsiolohichnoho forumu Bahatovymirni prostory suchasnykh sotsialnykh zmin. Lviv: Vydavnychyi tsentr Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. I. Franka [in Ukrainian]

  10. Riazanova, L.S. (2004). Relihiine vidrodzhennia v Ukraini. Kyiv: Bila krynytsia [in Ukrainian]

  11. Dudar, N., Bychenko, A. (2002). Relihiinist ukrainskoho suspilstva: riven, kharakter, osoblyvosti. Natsionalna bezpeka i oborona, 10 (34), 14-21 [in Ukrainian]

  12. Melnyk, V.B. (2002). Relihiinist u suchasnii Ukraini. Relihiia. Nauka. Suspilstvo, 3. URL: http://old.risu.org.ua/ukr/study/research_conference/melnyk_religiosity/,www.iai.donetsk.ua/_u/iai/dtp/CONF/12/articles/sec4/s4a11.html [in Ukrainian]

  13. Melnyk, V.B. Relihiinist yak faktor suspilnoi stabilnosti. URL: http://westukr.itgo.com/v_melnyk.html [in Ukrainian]

  14. Salnikova, S.A. (2009). Metodolohichni zasady vymiriuvannia relihiinosti. Naukovyi visnyk Volynskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. Lesi Ukrainky, 28, 137-143 [in Ukrainian]

  15. Veremchuk, V.I. (2004). Sotsiologiya religii. Moskva: YuNITI-DANA [in Russian]

  16. Yablokov, I.N. (1998). Religiovedenie. Moskva: Gardarika [in Russian]

  17. Yablokov, I.N. (1994). Osnovy teoreticheskogo religiovedeniya. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola [in Russian]

  18. Lobovyk, B. (1996). Relihiia yak fenomen i katehoriia relihiieznavstva. Ukrainske relihiieznavstvo, 4, 3-12 [in Ukrainian]

    https://doi.org/10.32420/1996.4.68

  19. Meagher, P.K. (1979). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Religion. In T.C. O’Brien (Ed.), Corpur Publication. Washington: D.C.

  20. Dzheims, U. (1992). Mnogoobrazie religioznogo opyta. Sankt Peterburg [in Russian]

  21. Fromm, E. (1990). Psikhoanaliz i religiya. Sumerki bogov. Moskva [in Russian]

  22. Panina, N.V. (2008). Izbrannye trudy po sotsiologii. In  E.I. Golovakha (Ed.), Teoriya, metody i rezultaty sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya obraza zhizni, psikhologicheskogo sostoyaniya i sotsialnogo samochuvstviya naseleniya. Kiev: Fakt [in Russian]

Full text