The article dwells upon the analysis of the social world picture’s influence on social subjects’ choice of the trajectory of the socio-historical development.
The main argument presented by the author is that the actors’ social world picture that determines the strategy of the Ukrainian development is formed with the ideas and conceptual constructs that are drawn heavily from mainstream of the Western social sciences.
The simulation and peripheral nature of the Ukrainian development model is demonstrated. The attitudes of the Ukrainian population to this model are explored.
Davydov, V.M. (1991). Latin American periphery of the world capitalism. (Essays on the socio-economic development). Moscow: Nauka [in Russian]
Prebish, R. (1992). Peripheral Capitalism: is there an alternative to it? Moscow: ILA RAS [in Russian]
Tarasenko, V.I., Ivanenko, O.O. (2004). The problem of the social identification of Ukrainian society (sociotechnological paradigm). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]
Fisun, A.A. (2006). Democracy, neopatrimonialism and global transformations. Kharkiv: Constanta [in Russian]
Gilman, N. (2003). Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Grosfoguel, R. (2006). World-Systems Analysis in the Context of Transmodernity, Border Thinking, and Global Coloniality. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 29, 2, 167-188.