Article authors

  • Bova A. A.
    PhD. in Sociology
    Senior scientific fellow, Head of the research department
    State research institute, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine
    4A, Kuruzova Str., Kyiv, 01011, Ukraine
    anagram@ukr.net
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sociology

Modelling the determinative of domestic violence

Ukr. socìum, 2005, 1(6): 15-25
Language:
Ukrainian
https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2005.01.015
470
3
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

In the article considers theoretical concepts and empirical researches of factors of family violin. On the basis of abstract generalization of the researches which have been lead to the USSR, the USA, Great Britain and Ukraine are allocated group of the factors causing family violin’s: demographic characteristics, living conditions and social status, a mental and physical state of health, a level of social support, lacks of the social-psychological communications.

  1. Luniak, M. (2002). Nasylstvo yak pravova ta filosofska problema. Pravo Ukrainy, 7 [in Ukrainian]

  2. Seregin, V. (1999). Kultura sily i beskulture nasiliya. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya, 7 [in Russian]

  3. Opredelenie fenomena nasiliya. (2001). Borba s prestupnostyu za rubezhom, 2 [in Russian]

  4. Sadyk, N. (2000). Odna zhizn – dva mira. Muzhchina i zhenshchina v period peremen. Narodonaselenie mira. 2000 god. New York: International Graphic Communications Services [in Russian]

  5. Muller, U., Schruttle, M., Glammeier, S. (2004). Health, WellBeing and Personal Safety o f Women in Germany. A Representative Study of Violence against Women in Germany. Summary of the central research results. Berlin: Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth.

  6. Lopushanskii, F.A. (Ed.). (1989). Preduprezhdenie semeinobytovykh pravonarushenii. Moskva: Nauka [in Russian]

  7. Shestakov, D.A. (1992). Supruzheskoe ubiistvo kak obshchestvennaya problema. Sankt-Peterburg: SPbGU [in Russian]

  8. Moshak, G.G. (1989). Prestupleniya v seme: istoki i profilaktika. Kishinev: Kartya Moldovenyaske [in Russian]

  9. Abeltsev, S. (1999). Semeinye konflikty i prestupleniya. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya, 5 [in Russian]

  10. Holovkin, B.M. (2003). Simeinopobutovi konflikty v systemi determinatsii umysnykh vbyvstv i tiazhkykh tilesnykh ushkodzhen. Kharkiv: Natsionalna yurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Ya. Mudroho [in Ukrainian]

  11. Dumko, F. (1999). Nasylstvo v simi. Metodyka zboru ta analizu informatsii. Odesa: Odeskyi intstytut vnutrishnikh sprav [in Ukrainian]

  12. Maksymova, N., Miliutina, K. (2003). Sotsialno-psykholohichni aspekty problemy nasylstva. Kyiv: Komitet spryiannia zakhystu prav dytyny [in Ukrainian]

  13. Akosta, V.G., Bysly, M., Dzhajma, Sh. i dr. (2002). Nasylye v seme. Kak borotsa s nym gosudarstvu. Chto ymeem y chto sleduet sdelat. Kyiv: Winrock International [in Russian]

  14. Kochetkova, S.V. (1999). Opyt analiza nasiliya v seme. Socis – Sociological Studies, 12 [in Russian]

  15. Tompson, D.L., Pristli, D. (1998). Sotsiologiya: Vvodnyi kurs. Moskva: OOO Izdatelstvo AST, Lvov: Initsiativa [in Russian]

  16. Hrabska, I.K. (1998). Nasylstvo u podruzhnikh stosunkakh: zarubizhnyi dosvid doslidzhen ta konsultuvannia. Praktychna psykholohiia ta sotsialna robota, 9 [in Ukrainian]

  17. Shynkarenko, O.D. (2001). Osobystisni osoblyvosti zhinok-zhertv podruzhnoho nasylstva (Syndrom pobytoi zhinky). Kyiv: Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni T. Shevchenka [in Ukrainian]

  18. Strategii borby s nasiliem v seme. (1998). Nyu-Iork: OON [in Russian]

  19. Shipunova, T.V. (2002). Agressiya i nasilie kak elementy sotsiokulturnoi realnosti. Socis – Sociological Studies, 5 [in Russian]

  20. Bondarovska, V. (2004). Totalitarna simia yak dzherelo domashnoho nasylstva. URL: ozis.kr.ua/totfaml.html [in Ukrainian]

  21. Shnaider, G.I. (1994). Kriminologiya. Moskva: Izdatelskaya gruppa Progress Univers [in Russian]

  22. Lobanov, V.A. (1982). Ugolovnopravovaya i kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika bytovykh prestuplenii. Minsk: MVD SSSR. Minskaya Vysshaya shkola [in Russian]

  23. Rennison, C.M., Welchans, S. (2000). Intimate Partner Violence. Bureau of Justice Statistics. NCJ 178247. Washington, DC. URL: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/scans/bjs/ipv.pdf

  24. Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N. (2000). Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women. Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey. NCJ 181867. Washington, DC. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?

  25. Walby, S. Allen, J. (2004). Domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey. Home Office Research Study 276. URL: https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/resources/sociology-online-papers/papers/walby-hors.pdf

  26. Pisklakova, M.P. (2003). Chto takoe domashnee nasilie? Sotsialno-psikhologicheskie i meditsinskie aspekty zhestokosti, 1 [in Russian]

  27. Topalov, D.P. (2002). Psykhoprofilaktyka pervynnykh seksualnykh rozladiv u cholovikiv. Ministerstvo okhorony zdorovia Ukrainy. Kharkivska medychna akademiia pisliadyplomnoi osvity. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian]

  28. Potapchuk, Ye.M. (1998). Psykhoprofilaktyka mizhosobystisnykh konfliktiv u simiakh viiskovosluzhbovtsiv prykordonnykh viisk. Akademiia Prykordonnykh viisk Ukrainy imeni Bohdana Khmelnytskoho. Khmelnytskyi [in Ukrainian]

  29. Krupka, Yu. (1987). Vyvchennia povedinky osib, yaki vchyniaiut zlochyn u sferi simeino-pobutovykh vidnosyn. Radianske pravo, 2 [in Ukrainian]

  30. Kryshtal, Ye.V. (1998). Alkoholizm podruzhnoi pary: klinichni ta sotsialno-psykholohichni aspekty. Kharkiv: Kharkivskyi instytut udoskonalennia likariv [in Ukrainian]

  31. Kryzhna, L.V. (2000). Poperedzhennia zlochyniv, shcho vchyniuiutsia u sferi simeinopobutovykh vidnosyn. Kyiv: Natsionalna akademiia vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy [in Ukrainian]

  32. Boiko, O.V. (2003). Nasylstvo v simi: sotsiolohichnyi analiz yavyshcha. Kharkiv: Natsionalnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav [in Ukrainian]

Full text