Mothering and care for children in a risk society

247
8
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

The author evaluates the theoretical potential of the “risk society” concept for research of contemporary mothering. The paper is based on statistical data as well as on author’s study of practices of combining paid labor and care for children by employed mothers. The author distinguishes two dimensions of applying the concept of risk society. First, the impact of a society of risk and uncertainty on women’s reproductive attitudes and practices. One of the motivations of postponed childbirth and fertility intentions on giving birth to only one child is fear for the fate of children, especially in societies with economic and political instability.

These risks are gendered, that is caused by high probability of divorce in Ukraine and high number of mother-headed families in Ukraine, the risk of poverty of these families, and the emergence of conflict between paid and reproductive labor, especially in terms of increasing social and cultural “standards of motherhood”. Secondly, it is the impact of risk society and “culture of fear” on everyday mothering practices. The author’s research demonstrates that issue of parental fears, various threats to children and the mothers’ desire to protect the child from them is a part of the contemporary mothers’ narratives.

The mothers’ ideas of space outside the home as a dangerous for the child is more than just a discourse, but also is a part of the daily care practices for the child.

  1. Bunina, L.M. (2005). Forming skills of conscious parenthood by means of social-pedagogical support in Northern Ireland. Luhansk: Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University [in Ukrainian]

  2. Leshchenko, O.G. (2010). The socio-pedagogical conditions of forming responsible attitude to parenthood of young married couples. Luhansk: Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University [in Ukrainian]

  3. Maksimovska, N.O. (2008). Formation of female youth maternity culture in social-pedagogical environment of a higher education institution. Luhansk: Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University [in Ukrainian]

  4. Shevchenko, N.Yu. (2006). The social-pedagogical means of forming parents’ conscious attitude to children rights. Luhansk: Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University [in Ukrainian]

  5. Vnukovskaya, T.N. (2014). Theory and methodology of reproductive labor risks. Moscow: Mir nauki [in Russian]

  6. Bauman, Z. (2002). The Individualized Society. Moscow: Logos [in Russian]

  7. Beck, U., Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage

  8. Beck, U., Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press

  9. Beck, U. (2000). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya [in Russian]

  10. Marriage, family, and reproductive orientations in Ukraine. (2008). Kyiv: ADEF-Ukraina [in Ukrainian]

  11. Cherenko, L.M., Poliakova, S.V., Reut, A.G. et al. (2009). Poverty and unequal opportunities for children in Ukraine. Kyiv: Ptoukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies of National Academy of Science of Ukraine, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Ukrainian Center for Social Reforms [in Ukrainian]

  12. Cherenko, L.M., Poliakova, S.V., Shyshkiv, V.S. et al. (2011). Unequal opportunities of children in Ukraine: Analysis and Recommendations for Policy (based on monitoring of economic inequality of households and children’s access to social services). Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo K.I.S [in Ukrainian]

  13. Libanova, E.M., Makarova, O.V., Aksonova, S.Yu. et al. (2012). The analytical study of women’s participation in the labor force in Ukraine. Kyiv: Ptoukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies of National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Ukrainian Center for Social Reforms, Center ‘Social Monitoring’, United Nations Population Fund [in Ukrainian]

  14. Verhulenko, I., Gumen, K., Timets, O., Tkalich, O. (2013). Mothers on the labor market. Spilne. Zhurnal sotsialnoi krytyky – Common. The Journal of Social Criticism, 6, 70-77 [in Ukrainian]

  15. Strelnyk, O.O. (2015). Family (un)friendly workplaces: the results of sociological survey. Ukr. socìum – Ukrainian society, 4 (55), 75-84 [in Ukrainian]

  16. Antonov, A.I. (2014). Institutional crisis of the family and family-demographic structures in the context of social change and social inequality. Sem’ya i demograficheskie issledovaniya – Family and demographic studies. URL: https://riss.ru/demography/demography-science-journal/5273/ [in Russian]

  17. Anxo, D., Bosch, G., Rubery, J. (2010). Shaping the life course. The Welfare State and Life Transitions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

  18. Franklin, L., Crowby, J. (2009). Everyday Fear: Parenting and Childhood in a Culture of Fear. In L. Franklin, R. Richardson (Eds.),  The Many Forms of Fear, Horror and Terror (pp. 161–174). Oxford, United Kingdom: Inter-Disciplinary Press

  19. Glassner, B. (1999). The culture of Fear: Why Americans Fear the Wrong. New York: Basic Books

  20. Furedi, F. (2002). Paranoid parenting: Why ignoring the experts may be best for your child, Chicago: Chicago Review Press

  21. Lee, E. (2014). Introduction. In Parenting Culture Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan

  22. Asonova, E. (2010). The new values in parents and children relationships. Pro et Contra, 14 (1-2), 78-93 [in Russian]

Full text