The article presents specific features and characteristics of the Ukrainian sociology development in general and sociological theorizing in particular; author traces the influence of the “Soviet heritage” in sociology in Ukraine and the difficulty of producing its own general sociological theory, resulting in the methodological crisis of 1990s–early 2000s, which is now is being slowly mastered.
Paper suggests analysis of the similar processes for Russian sociology, and highlights a number of common and specific features in their development. With the experience of John Ritzer, the essence, stages, and varieties of sociological metatheorizing as the highest type of the general sociological theory are viewed and the possibilities and limits of application are defined. Based on this, a comparative analysis of the current state of metatheorizing in Ukrainian and Russian sociology made a generalization about their local specifications, which constitute separate cases of development of theorizing in a global sociology.
These include (according to the classification of J. Ritzer) both sociologies being at the first stage of metatheorizing (Mu), but with a more profound its representation in Russian sociology and solitary interventions of the representatives of Ukrainian sociology at the second stage (Mp); increased researchers’ attention to new images of social reality either in stabilization or in transformation types of metatheorizing (by typology of D. Ivanov) in both sociologies. At the same time, in the Ukrainian and Russian versions of metatheorizing there are noticeable differences in the magnitude and time of the discussion of these issues; in the intensity or weakness of the “Soviet heritage” in the area of theorizing; in the degree of expansion of the discussion and debates of metatheorizing; the outcome of these discussions on the problems of interdisciplinarity and methodological turns of the present.
The paper concludes with a statement of a number of problematic issues that require clarification and elaboration of agreed positions and highlight prospects for further research in the field of general sociological theory and metatheorizing.
Tarasenko, V.I. (2001). Educational technologies in Ukrainian sociology. In M.O. Shulha (Ed.), Problems of development of sociological theory. Theoretical problems of a changing social structure of Ukrainian society: Scientific reports and messages of the First all-Ukrainian sociological conference (pp. 13-22). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]
Tarasenko, V.I. (2002). A conceptual deficit of the macrostructure ideas about the society in sociology. In M.O. Shulha (Ed.), Problems of development of sociological theory. Theoretical problems of a changing social structure of Ukrainian society: Scientific reports and messages of the Second all-Ukrainian sociological conference (pp. 21-31). Kyiv: SAU, Institute of sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]
Tarasenko, V.I. (2007). Lecture 1. The conceptual framework of sociology of the XXI century. In A. Ruchka (Ed.), Sociological theory: tradition and modernity: a tutorial (pp. 7-49). Kyiv: Institute of sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]
Dogan, M. (2010). Sociology among the social Sciences. Socis – Sociological Studies, 10, 3-13 [in Russian]
Ivanov, D.V. (2017). The trend of metatheoretically in modern sociology. Socis – Sociological Studies, 11, 3-10 [in Russian]
Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science. The American Sociologist, 10, 3, 156-167.
Ritzer, G. (1990). Metatheorizing in Sociology. Sociological Forum, 5, 1, 3-15.
Ritzer, G. (2002). Modern sociological theories. 5th ed. Saint Petersburg: Piter [in Russian]
Zhao Shanyang. (2001). Chapter 29: Metatheorizing in Sociology. In G. Ritzer, B. Smart (Eds.), Handbook of Social Theory.
Kultygin, V.P. (2009). Current state of national sociology. In G.V. Osipov, V.P. Kultygin (Eds.), History of sociology. Moscow: Norma [in Russian]
Tatarova, G.G. (2006). Methodological trauma of the sociologist. To the question of knowledge integration. Socis – Sociological Studies, 9, 3-12 [in Russian]
Radaev, V.V. (2008). Is a positive program possible for Russian sociology? Socis – Sociological Studies, 7, 24-33 [in Russian]
Yadov, V.A. (2008). Why national Russian sociology is needed today? Socis – Sociological Studies, 4, 3-7 [in Russian]
Devyatko, I. (2017). Metatheorizing or philosophy of social sciences? Socis – Sociological Studies, 12, 3-9 [in Russian]
Dudina, V.I. (2017). Strategies of metatheorizing in sociology. Socis – Sociological Studies, 12, 10-19 [in Russian]
Trotsuk, I.V. (2017). On metatheorizing in the analysis of text data. Socis – Sociological Studies, 9, 12-21 [in Russian]
Chernysh, N. (2016). The influence of trust and trust relations on the formation of a new social institution of volunteering in modern Ukraine. Sotsiolohiia: teoriia, metody, marketyng – Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 2, 26-38 [in Ukrainian]
Pylypenko, V. (2017). Metatheorizing in sociology: specifics, types and directions. Sotsiolohiia: teoriia, metody, marketyng – Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 2, 59-76 [in Ukrainian]
Yakovenko, Yu. (2017). Methodological trauma in the sociological fields of Ukraine. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. Seriia Sotsiolohichni doslidzhennia suspilstva: metodolohiia, teoriia, metody – Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Sociological researches of modern society: methodology, theory, methods, 39, 9-27 [in Ukrainian]
Shulha, M. (Ed.). (2017). The state of contemporary Ukrainian society: the civilizational dimension. Kyiv: Institute of sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]
Makeieva, S., Oksamytna, S. (Eds.). (2017). The state of singularity: the social structure, situations, behavioral practices. Kyiv: Institute of sociology NAS of Ukraine, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy [in Ukrainian]
Yakovenko, A. (2017). Metatheorizing: the major social obstacles and challenges. Socis – Sociological Studies, 12, 11-18 [in Russian]
Chernysh, N. (2017). Sociology of modernity: tendencies and perspectives for development. Sotsiolohiia: teoriia, metody, marketyng – Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 4, 5-21 [in Ukrainian]