Heuristic potential of emotional labor concepts, trust and public space in the study of solo-living


This article attempts to identify the heuristic potential of the concepts of A. Hochschild, D. Gambetta, and R. Sennett in the study of the “solo-living” phenomenon. Considering the concepts of emotional work, public and personal spaces, as well as trust, the author considers the possibility of applying the concepts in the study of non-family forms of partnership. In the analysis of concepts it is determined that they could potentially explain the occurrence and development of such forms as “solo-living”. Through the prism of the sociology of emotions by A. Hochschild, the author of the article examines the unwillingness or inability to perform emotional work as one of the factors about the increasing number of individuals living alone. At the same time, R. Sennett’s concept shows how “solo-living” arises in response to the absorption of personal space by the public, and one of the premises of “solo-living”, according to the concept of trust of D. Gambetta, is weak family ties. The author comes to a conclusion that the concepts have heuristic potential for the study of these phenomena but do not claim to be exhaustive. The limitations of the study are indicated: for example, the concept of emotional labor concerns mainly women, while ignoring the study of the difficulties that men may encounter in the context of a given problem, which also seems necessary from the author’s point of view; R. Sennett focuses on urban space. In its turn globalization erases the boundaries between cities and countries, thereby making the space global, which acquires special significance in the context of studying, for example, such a form of partnership as distance relations – which can also be considered in the context of the phenomenon of “solo-living” study. The author also discusses the prospects for further research of “solo-living” within the framework of the concepts of A. Hochschild, D. Gambetta and R. Sennett and also raises the research question about the possibility of synthesizing the presented concepts as an explanatory model for the development of various forms of partnership.

  1. The Future of Families to 2030. A synthesis report. URL: https://www.oecd.org/futures/49093502.pdf

  2. Jurkane-Hobein, I. (2015). I Imagine You Here Now. Relationship Maintenance Strategies in Long-Distance Intimate Relationships. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences 108. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

  3. Baranwal, J. Ram, B. (1985). Societal Development, Familialism and Solo Living: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 16 (1), 61-73. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41601530

  4. Goode, W. (1970). World revolution and family patterns. New York: Collier-Macmillan.

  5. Keilman, N. (1988). Recent trends in family and household composition in Europe. European Journal of Population, 3 (3/4), 297-325. URL: https://folk.uio.no/keilman/famhhEJP.pdf

  6. Ayad, M., Barrer, B., Otto, J. (1997). Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of households. Demographic and Health Surveys Comparative Studies, 26. Calverton: Macro International Inc. URL: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/CS26/CS26.pdf

  7. Bongaarts, J. (2001). Household size and composition in the developing world in the 1990s. Population Studies, 55 (3), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324720127697

  8. Fokkema, T., Liefbroer, A. (2008). Trends in living arrangements in Europe: Convergence or divergence? Demographic Research, 19, 1351-1418. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2008.19.36

  9. Stone, J., Berrington, A., Falkingham, J. (2011). The changing determinants of UK young adults’ living arrangements. Demographic Research, 25, 629–666. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.20

  10. Simonova, O. (2019). Emotional Culture as Sociological Concept: On Emotional Turn in Knowledge and society. URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/2019/05/22/1508325674/%D0%90%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%84_%D0%A1%D0%BE%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%A1%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_%C2%AB%D0%AD%D0%BC%D0%BE..%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F.pdf

  11. Hochschild, A.R. (2003). The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of CA Press. URL: https://caringlabor.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/the-managed-heart-arlie-russell-hochschild.pdf

  12. Simonova, O. (2013). Emotional labor in modern society: rethinkihg and conceptualizing ideas of A.R. Hochschild. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 11 (3), 339-354. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/emotsionalnyy-trud-v-sovremennom-obschestve-nauchnye-diskussii-i-dalneyshaya-kontseptualizatsiya-idey-a-r-hohshild/viewer [in Russian]

  13. Hochschild, A., Machung, A. (2003b). The second shift. New York: Penguin Books.

  14. Sociologist Elena Zdravomyslova – about the “unproductive” oldness and pain of the “sandwich generation”. (2016). The Village. URL: https://www.the-village.ru/village/people/city-news/232683-sandwich-generation [in Russian]

  15. Goffman, I. (2000). The Presentation Self in Every Day Life. Moscow: Kanon-press-Ts. URL: https://cfs.hse.ru/data/2016/04/07/1127142131/%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%20-%20%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B4%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%20%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B1%D1%8F%20%D0%B4%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BC%20%D0%B2%20%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9%20%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B8%20(2000).pdf [in Russian]

  16. Vershinina, I. (2012). Sociology of the city by Richard Sennett: Transformation of the Public Sphere. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Sotsiologiya i politologiyaJournal of Moscow University. Sociology and Political Science, 18, 4, 154-161. URL: https://www.socio.msu.ru/vestnik/archive/text/2012/4/10.pdf [in Russian]

  17. Kleinenberg, E. (2018). Going solo: The Extraordinary Rise and Surprising Appeal of Living Alone. Moscow: ANF [in Russian]

  18. Sennet, R. (2002). The Fall of a Public Man. URL: https://bookap.info/book/sennet_padenie_publichnogo_cheloveka/

  19. Lebedeva, N. (2012). Book Review: Sennet R. The Fall of a Public Man. Sotsiologiya vlasti – Sociology of Power, 6-7 (1), 282-287. URL: https://www.academia.edu/13082618/%D0%A0%D0%B5%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BA%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B3%D1%83_%D0%A1%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%82_%D0%A0._%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B0 [in Russian]

  20. Bauman, Z. (2005). Individualized society. Moscow: Logos [in Russian]

  21. Gambetta, D. (Ed.). (2008). Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford: University of Oxford. URL: http://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/users/gambetta/Trust_making%20and%20breaking%20cooperative%20relations.pdf

  22. Ermisch, J., Gambetta, D., (2010). Do strong family ties inhibit trust? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75 (3), 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.05.007

Full text