Membership in social organizations as cooperative practice

213
3
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

The author presents the results of studies of the factors of the participation of the Ukrainian citizens in voluntary associations as the cooperative practice. The hypothesis on the effect of interpersonal faith as an indicator of the social capital has not been confirmed. A partial influence of the ideological and regional distinctions, education, the interest in policy, and the political identification is fixed. However, the greatest and most stable effect on cooperative practices is produced by the active habits of leisure, in particular, the sporting ones.

  1. Leipkhart, A. (1997). Demokratiya v mnogosostavnykh obshchestvakh. Moskva: Aspekt Press [in Russian]

  2. McFarland, D.A. (2006). Bowling Young: How Youth Voluntary Associations Influence Adult Political Participation. American Sociological Review, 71, 3, 401-425.

  3. Stuckler, D., King, L., McKee, M. (2009). Mass privatisation and the post-communist mortality crisis: a cross-national analysis, available at. URL: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60005-2/fulltext

  4. Avuieva, I. (2003). Sotsialnyi portret chleniv sotsialnykh rukhiv, hromadskykh orhanizatsii ta politychnykh partii. In Ukrainske suspilstvo-2003 (pp. 283-291). Kyiv: IS NANU [in Ukrainian]

  5. Yurchenko, I. (2005). Dynamika suspilno-politychnoi aktyvnosti naselennia Ukrainy. Sotsialni vymiry suspilstva, 8, 188-202 [in Ukrainian]

  6. Stegniy, O. (2007). Regional Factor of the Development of the Ukrainians’ Political Culture. In Ukrainian Sociological Review (2004–2005) (pp. 88-121) [in Ukrainian]

  7. Bekeshkina, I. (2008). Chleny hromadskykh obiednan yak osoblyva sotsialna hrupa. In Ukrainske suspilstvo 1992-2008 (pp. 382-395). Kyiv: IS NANU [in Ukrainian]

  8. Parsons, T. (1998). Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv. Moskva: Aspekt Press [in Russian]

  9. Khantington, S. (2004). Politicheskii poryadok v menyayushchikhsya obshchestvakh. Moskva: Progress Traditsiya [in Russian]

  10. Gordon, C.W. (1959). A Typology of Voluntary Associations. American Sociological Review, 24, 1, 22-29.

  11. Babchuk, N., Booth, A. (1969). Voluntary Association Membership: A Longitudinal Analysis. American Sociological Review, 34, 1, 31-45.

  12. Vainola, R.Kh., Kapska, A.Y., Komarova, N.M. ta in. (1999). Volonterskyi rukh v Ukraini. Kyiv: Akadempres [in Ukrainian]

  13. Patnam, R. (2001). Tvorennia demokratii. Tradytsii hromadianskoi aktyvnosti v suchasnii Italii. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian]

  14. Demkiv, O. (2004). Sotsialnyi kapital: teoretychni zasady doslidzhennia ta operatsionalni parametry. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing – Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 4, 99-111 [in Ukrainian]

  15. Scott, J.C. (1957). Membership and Participation in Voluntary Associations. American Sociological Review, 22, 315-326.

  16. Curtis, J.E. (1992). Voluntary Association Membership in Fifteen Countries: A Comparative Analysis. American Sociological Review, 57, 2, 139-152.

  17. Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., Brady, H.E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics.  Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

  18. Curtis, J.E. (2001). Nations of Joiners: Explaining Voluntary Association Membership in Democratic Societies. American Sociological Review, 66, 6, 783-805.

  19. Lipset, S.M., (1985). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments. In S.M. Lipset, S. Rokkan (Eds.), Consensus and Conflict: Essays in Political Sociology (pp. 113-186). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

  20. Sampson, R. (2005). Civil society reconsidered: the durable nature and community structure of collective civic action. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 3, 673-714.

  21. Horbachyk, A.P., Salnykova, S.A. (2008). Analiz danykh sotsiolohichnykh doslidzhen zasobamy SPSS. Lutsk: RVV Vezha Volynskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky [in Ukrainian]

Full text