Cultural participation in Ukraine: barriers and incentives

1K+
12
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

The article is devoted to the analysis of cultural participation peculiarities in the current state of emergency in Ukraine. The author shows the relevance and prevalence of monitoring and international research of participation in culture and efforts to standardize cultural statistics in modern sociology. These data serve as the basis for the development of sound social and cultural policy in modern states. Based on the monitoring data of “Ukrainian society”, author revealed the downward trends of recent years aimed at attraction the majority of cultural and leisure activities, reducing costs for cultural needs, the presence of obstacles for active invovement in culture. Structural conditions of cultural stratification in the form of economics, settlement, age irregularities are reproduced.

The state of emergency in the Ukrainian society has a restraining effect on the involvement of the majority of the population in culture and leisure. 62% of respondents lack the opportunity to fully spend their holidays, 50% – full leisure. Only one in four of the respondents can afford an interesting leisure time, 17% – can spend a vacation to their liking, less than 20% of respondents allow themselves to buy modern gadgets, books and magazines, gifts, tickets to cultural and leisure facilities. The rest of the population is limited in their spendings, including through economic, settlement, age factors, health status. As potential incentives for the population participation the growing importance of such values as the democratic development of the country, the free expression of personal opinions on political and other issues, national and cultural revival, participation in the activities of parties and public organizations can be used. At the same time, cultural participation in the public space is very limited: only 14% of respondents more or less regularly attend cultural events (performances, film shows, concerts, exhibitions), about 6% take an active part in the organization and conducting of cultural events. Under gіven circumstances, we can talk about the strengthening of cultural polarization in the current conditions of emergency in the Ukrainian society, the lack of conditions for the full satisfaction of citizens’ basic rights to rest, participate in culture, and support of cultural identity.

It is emphasized that the database of the monitoring study “Ukrainian society” of the Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine contains a set of indicators that are similar to those developed in the international cultural statistics and make it possible to analyze the structure and dynamics of the cultural participation of the population.

  1. Fleury, L. (2014). Sociology of Culture and Cultural Practices. The Transformative Power of Institutions. Lexington Books.

  2. DiMaggio, P., Mukhtar, T. (2004). Arts Participation as Cultural Capital in the United States, 1982-2002: Signs of decline? Poetics, 32, 169-194.

  3. Semashka, O., Pichi, V. (2002). Sociology of culture. Kyiv: Karavela, Lviv: PP Novyy Svit 2000 [in Ukrainian]

  4. Measuring Cultural Participation. 2009 Framework For Cultural Statistics Handbook No. 2. (2012). Montreal: UNESCO UIS.

  5. Cultural Statistics. Eurostat Pocketbooks. European Commission. (2007). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

  6. Cultural Statistics. Eurostat Pocketbooks. European Commission. (2011). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

  7. Culture Statistics. 2016 Edition. Eurostat books. European Commission. (2016). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

  8. Skokova, L. (2016). Cultural practices and cultural policies: modern research infrastructure. Social dimensions of the society, 8 (19), 287-308 [in Ukrainian]

  9. Special Eurobarometer 399. Cultural Access and Participation. Report. (2013). Wave EB79.2 – TNS Opinion & Social. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_399_en.pdf

  10. Country Profile Ukraine. (2017). URL: http://www.culturalpolicies.net/web/countries-profiles-download.php

  11. Vorona, V.M., Shulha, M.O. (Eds.). (2014). Ukrainian Society: monitoring of social change, 1 (15), 1. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]

  12. Vorona, V.M., Shulha, M.O. (Eds.). (2015). Ukrainian Society: monitoring of social change, 2 (16). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]

  13. Vorona, V.M., Shulha, M.O. (Eds.). (2016). Ukrainian Society: monitoring of social change, 3 (17). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]

  14. Ruchka, A.O. (Ed.). (2002). Sociocultural identities and practices. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]

  15. Kostenko, N., Ruchka, A.O. (Eds.). (2008). Media. Democracy. Culture. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]

  16. Kostenko, N., Ruchka, A.O. (Eds.). (2010). Subcultural variation in the Ukrainian society. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]

  17. Kostenko, N. (Ed.). (2012). Semantic morphology of society. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]

  18. Kostenko, N. (Ed.). (2015). Variability of culture: a sociological projection. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]

  19. Youth of Ukraine – 2015. (2015). Ministry of youth and sports of Ukraine. Kyiv: GFK Ukraine [in Ukrainian]

  20. Dmytruk, N., Padalka G., Kirieieva, S., Mostova, I., Bikla, O., Shelepa, V. (2016). Values of Ukrainian youth. The results of a representative sociological study of the current youth state. Kyiv: Ministry of youth and sports of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]

  21. Youth of Ukraine – 2017. Social Study results. (2017). Ternopil: Terno-graf  [in Ukrainian]

  22. Bondar, T.V., Dmytruk, D.A. (2017). New Year sentiments and expectations: monitoring of Ukrainian population’s public opinion, December of 2017. Ukr. socìum – Ukrainian society, 4 (63), 168-177 [in Ukrainian]

  23. Balakireva, O.M., Bondar, T.V., Pavlova, D.M., Ryngach, N.O., Bilous, Ie.I., Vasylashko, I.P., Patrikieieva, O.O., Sydiak, S.V., Sakovych, O.T., Shvets, O.V., Zabuzova, V.V., Balakireva, K.O., Lokteva, I.I. (2014). Indicators and social context of adolescent health. Based on the results of a sociological survey in the framework of the WHO international project ‘Health Behaviour in School-aged Children’ HBSC. Kyiv: UNICEF, NGO ‘UISR after Oleksandr Yaremenko’ [in Ukrainian]

  24. Albenina, V.L., Sokuryanska, L.H. (Eds.). (2012). Ukrainian students in their search of identity. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University [in Ukrainian]

  25. Sokuryanska, L.H. (2016). Methodological and methodical problems of international comparative studies of students. In S. Shchudlo, P. Dlugosh (Eds.), Youth policy: problems and prospects: collection of scientific works (pp. 228-234). Drogobych – Zheshuv: Track LTD [in Ukrainian]

  26. Kostenko, N. (2016). In the state of ’emergency’: cultural effects. Sotsiolohiia: teoriia, metody, marketynh – Sociology:theory, methods, marketing, 4, 102-118 [in Ukrainian]

Full text