Social support for integration practices of Ukrainian veterans in higher education


The article studies the features of social adaptation of veteran students in Ukrainian universities. The motivation of Ukrainian veterans to enter universities has been analysed. The main problems of their social adaptation to the university environment are revealed. Some results of five in-depth semi-structured interviews with veteran students in Kharkiv universities are presented. In particular, the value foundations of veterans’ motivation to enrol in universities have been identified. It is emphasised that veteran students perceive higher education as both terminal and instrumental value. Attention is focused on the fact that the value ambivalence influenced the educational motivation of veterans, for whom entering the university is an opportunity, on the one hand, to become an educated and self-realised person (terminal value) and, on the other hand, to have a good salary, make a career, take a higher status position in society (instrumental value). The positive influence of the military experience of veterans on their educational practices has been revealed. The opinion of most respondents is given regarding the fact that the army has taught them discipline, punctuality, which made them more self-confident. It is concluded that military experience contributes to developing some metacognitive learning skills in veterans, such as discipline and punctuality. The problems of academic integration of veteran students are considered. It is emphasised that veteran students do not experience difficulties in communication with other students and teachers and are not inclined to segregate from them. At the same time, there is little involvement of Ukrainian veterans in the university environment, which can be optimized in terms of social support for veterans in Ukrainian higher education. The author’s model of social support for student veterans in Ukrainian universities is presented.

  1. Schlossberg, N.K. (1981). A Model for Analyzing Human Adaptation to Transition. The Counseling Psychologist, 9, 2.

  2. Vacchi, D. (2012). Considering Student Veterans on the Twenty-first Century College Campus. About Campus, 17 (2), 15-21.

  3. Sokurianska, L., Bataeva, Е., Bakirov, V. (2019). Ukrainian veterans in higher education: military identity and educational practices. The Ideology and Politics Journal, 2 (13), 16-33. URL:­al%20FIN.pdf

  4. DiRamio, D., Jarvis, K. (2011). Veterans in Higher Education: when Johnny and Jane Come Marching to Campus. ASHE Higher Education Report, 37 (3), 1-144.

  5. Hunter-Johnson, Y. (2018). Promoting Veterans in Higher Education: Motivation and Adjustments to Their Learning Environments. International Research Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 4 (1), 66-79.

  6. Mramornova, О., Kharchenko, О. (2017). Employment Problems of Veterans of Anti-Terrorist Operation (ATO) in Eastern Ukraine. Humanizację Pracy, 1 (287), 107-123.

  7. Wheeler, H.A. (2012). Veterans’ transitions to community college: a case study. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36 (10): 775-792.

  8. Zinger, L., Cohen, A. (2010). Veterans Returning from War into the Classroom: How Can Colleges Be Better Prepared to Meet Their Needs. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 3 (1), 39-52.

  9. Lokken, J.M., Pfeffer, D., McCauley, J., Strong, C. (2009). A Statewide Approach to Creating Veteran-Friendly Campuses. New Directions for Student Services, 12, 45-54.

  10. Francis, L.C., Kraus, A. (2012). Developing a Student Veteran Center: The Confluence of Academic and Military Cultures. About Campus, 17 (4), 11-14.

  11. Persky, K.R., Oliver, D.E. (2010). Veterans Coming Home to the Community College: Linking Research to Practice. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 35 (1-2), 111-120.

  12. Woodruff, T., Kelty, R., Segal, D.R. (2006). Propensity to Serve and Motivation to Enlist Among American Combat Soldiers. Armed Forces and Society, 32 (3), 353-366.

  13. Molina, D. (2015). Post-9/11 Military Veterans and Higher Education: Factors Associated with College Enrollment and Choice. University of California.

  14. Perna, L.W., Titus, M.A. (2005). The Relationship Between Parental Involvement as Social Capital and College Enrollment: An Examination of Racial/Ethnic Group Differences. Journal of Higher Education, 76 (5), 485-518.

  15. Cunningham, J. (2012). Veteran’s Post-Secondary Education: Keeping the Promise to Those Who Serve. The Hinckley Journal of Politics, 13, 14-20.

  16. Arbenina, V., Sokurianska, L. (2012). State of Modern Students’ Educational Practices as a Socio-Cultural Barrier of Modernization of Higher Education in Ukraine. Ukrainian Sociological Journal, 1-2, 27-47 [in Ukrainian]

  17. Arbenina, V., Sokurianska, L. (Eds.) (2012). Ukrainian students in searching of identity. Kharkiv: V.N. Karasin Kharkiv National University [in Ukrainian]

  18. Sokurianska, L. (2006). Students on the Way to Another Society: The Value Discourse of Transition. Kharkiv: V.N. Karasin Kharkiv National University [in Russian]

  19. Beachboard, M.R., Beachboard, J.C., Li, W., Adkison, S.R. (2011). Cohorts and Relatedness: Self-determination Theory as an Explanation of How Learning Communities Affect Educational Outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52, 853-874.

  20. Campbell, E. (2016). Veteran Student Success: An Evaluation of Veteran Students’ Perceptions of a Cohort Learning Model. Oregon State University. URL:

  21. Saltiel, I.M., Russo, C.S. (2001). Cohort Programming and Learning: Improving Educational Experiences for Adult Learners. Malabar, FL: Krieger.

  22. Mackiewicz, D.H. (2018). An Exploration of Student Veterans’ Transitions from the Military to a Two-Year Community College and Their Perceptions of Support Services and Veteran Programs. Northeastern University. URL:

Full text