Sovereign democracy in Ukrainian online media: qualitative content analysis of the discourse of 2020

34
2
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

In contrast to the idea of universalism, which appeared after 1945, a trend towards sovereignty is developing in the modern world. Subject to international norms and laws, this trend towards the supremacy of the interests of individual states and governments is coherent in a world of “clear identities”. However, it has led to the social sciences discussion of the peculiarities of Russian, Eastern European, and Eurasian sovereignty in terms of discourses. However, in the 21st century, not (only) expert discussions have influence, particularly in scientific circles, but also discussions broadcasted by the media. So, recently, through media channels, the idea of the possibility of the “sovereign democracy” existence is being promoted (while experts are still arguing about the possibility of the existence of such a form of government). Since this discourse is directly related to the Russian context, and in the Ukrainian information field, various influences are recorded through Russian narratives, the thought appeared to track whether the idea of sovereign democracy is broadcasted through the Ukrainian media space and with the kind of semantic load. An empirical sociological study analysed reports by Ukrainian online media during 2020, which addressed various aspects of sovereignty and democracy, in particular, “sovereign democracy”. With qualitative content analysis, eight contexts of application of these concepts have been identified. Among them are the following: “American issue”, “Belarusian issue,” and others. All contexts are illustrated with examples of the real discourse of the Ukrainian media. Among the main conclusions of the research is that the presentation of the substantive characteristics of the sovereign democracy concept in the Ukrainian media corresponds to its interpretation by Russian ideologues and has a different content, which is often detached from its conceptual understanding. Coverage outside the interpretation of “sovereign democracy” in the style of Russian ideologues revolves around the synonymous use of the terms sovereignty and democracy.

  1. Ukrainians consume online media news erratically – a poll of the Center for the content analysis. (2020, November 5). Center for the content analysis. URL: https://ukrcontent.com/reports/ukrainci-spozhivayut-onlajn-novini-haotichno-opituvannya-cka.html [in Ukrainian]

  2. Polyakov, L.V. (2007). PRO sovereign democracy. Moscow: Evropa [in Russian]

  3. Plyais, Ya. (2008). “Sovereign democracy” – a new concept of the party of power. Vlast, 4, 24-32 [in Russian]

  4. Matvienko, Ya.Yu. (2008). Institutional and legal models of legitimation of sovereign democracy in modern Russia. Rostov-on-Don: Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education “Rostov Legal Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation”. URL: https://www.dissercat.com/content/institutsionalno-pravovye-modeli-legitimatsii-suverennoi-demokratii-v-sovremennoi-rossii [in Russian]

  5. Matvienko, Ya.Yu. (2008). “Sovereign democracy”: ambivalent definition or a notion from the postmodern politico-legal thesaurus. Filosofiya prava – Philosophy of Law, 1 (26), 44-48. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/suverennaya-demokratiya-ambivalentnaya-definitsiya-ili-ponyatie-iz-politiko-pravovogo-tezaurusa-postmoderna/viewer [in Russian]

  6. Krastev, I. (2006). “Sovereign Democracy”, Russian-Style. Insight Turkey, 8, 4, 113-117. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26328656?seq=1

  7. Casula, P. (2013). Sovereign Democracy, Populism and Depoliticization in Russia. Power and Discourse During Putin’s First Presidency. Problems of Post-Communism, 60, 3, 3-15.

  8. Demska-Kulchytska, O. (2004). What is a body of texts? Kultura slova – Culture of the word, 64, 35-38 [in Ukrainian]

  9. Ryabovol, L. (2019). State sovereignty: scientific approaches to defining the concept and degree of constraints in the context of globalization. Visnyk NTUU “KPI”. Politolohiia. Sotsiolohiia. Pravo – Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”. Politology. Sociology. Right, 3 (43), 262-266 [in Ukrainian]

  10. How they fight COVID-19 in the world: options for government decisions. (2020, March 27). International Center for Policy Studies. URL: http://icps.com.ua/yak-boryutsya-z-covid-19-u-sviti-varianty-uryadovykh-rishen/ [in Ukrainian]

  11. Miroshnichenko, A. (2020, November 27). Anger and polarization in social networks: it is not us, it is the media. COLTA. URL: https://www.colta.ru/articles/society/26056-andrey-miroshnichenko-sotsseti-agressiya-biznes-regumanizatsiya?fbclid=IwAR0Fs5Y8durhbKgajs1dfnUHTDYhpCt8bRIts0P__Hzw7vibSvbWBysDNAA [in Russian]

  12. Yuzva, L. (2017). Education reform in Ukraine: trends in July 2017 based on media content analysis. Molodizhna polityka: problemy ta perspektyvy, 8, 153-158 [in Ukrainian]

  13. Reforms in Ukraine: public opinion. (2020, January 29). Ilko Kucheriv “Democratic Initiatives” foundation. URL: https://dif.org.ua/article/reformi-v-ukraini-gromadska-dumka-naselennya-2019?fbclid=IwAR3b3iPv4wQ2iA5NQ_Bv2pjbKkyzgAib8Lp_batvDU9yyzvEJqULwYUFbDk [in Ukrainian]

  14. Coughlan, S. (2020, January 29). Dissatisfaction with democracy “at record high”. BBC. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/education-51281722

Full text