Refugeeship as a space of educational trajectories for Ukrainian schoolchildren: factors, barriers, and opportunities
The article explores the phenomenon of educational adaptation among Ukrainian school-aged refugees who were forced to leave Ukraine due to russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022 and relocate to various European Union countries. The research focuses on the educational trajectories of displaced children, analyzed within the broader context of transnational mobility. The study examines the social, cultural, and institutional factors influencing their integration into European educational systems. Particular attention is given to the barriers and resources that shape adaptation processes both within school environments and in extracurricular settings. Methodologically, the study is based on a qualitative research design and was implemented through a series of in-depth semi-structured interviews with parents and refugee schoolchildren. Empirical data were collected in 2023 and include 18 interviews with parents and 6 with adolescents residing in nine different European countries. Based on the analysis of the interviews, a typology of educational trajectories was developed to capture both successful adaptation cases and those marked by difficulties or educational disintegration. Key factors that facilitate integration include the child’s age at the time of displacement, level of foreign language proficiency, access to extracurricular activities, parenting style, and the presence of emotional support from teachers and a psychologically safe school climate. In contrast, barriers to effective adaptation were identified as language difficulties, double academic workload (in both the host country and Ukrainian distance schooling), social isolation within refugee peer groups, limited access to qualified psychological support, and the overall instability of future life plans. The study also documents tensions between the educational aspirations of children and their parents, particularly with regard to future residence choices, the possibility of returning to Ukraine, or pursuing higher education abroad.
DeCapua, A., Marshall, H.W. (2010). Serving ELLs With Limited or Interrupted Education: Intervention That Works. TESOL Journal, 1, 49-70.
Hos, R. (2016). The Lives, Aspirations, and Needs of Refugee and Immigrant Students with Interrupted Formal Education (SIFE) in a Secondary Newcomer Program. Urban Education, 55 (7), 1021-1044.
de Wal Pastoor, L. (2016). Rethinking Refugee Education: Principles, Policies and Practice from a European Perspective. In Annual Review of Comparative and International Education 2016. International Perspectives on Education and Society, Vol. 30 (pp. 107-116). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds.
Koehler, C., Palaiologou, N., Brussiono, O. (2022). Holistic refugee and newcomer education in Europe: Mapping, upscaling and institutionalising promising practices from Germany, Greece and the Netherlands. OECD Education Working Papers, 264.
Yenin, M., Kukhta, M., Prykhodko, T. (2024). Social needs and problems of forced migrants from Ukraine on the way to social adaptation and integration in the host society (example of Germany). Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 3, 117-138 [in Ukrainian]
Shevchenko, S. (2024). Ukrainian war migrants in Poland: lives of the adolescents and their mothers. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 4, 51-84 [in Ukrainian]
Hnatiuk, V. (2024). Continuous data-gathering system on migrants: a critical review. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 3, 169-182 [in Ukrainian]
Borysov, R. (2022). Ukrainian secondary school students about distance learning. Młodzież wobec zmian społecznych w świecie globalnych ryzyk. Rocznik Lubuski, 48 (1), 113-126.
Borysov, R., Sokuryanska, L. (2023). Education in extreme circumstances: opportunities, constraints, risks. Youth in Central and Eastern Europe, 10, 16, 18-28.
Boiko, D.M., Muradyan, O.S., Ivanchykhina, K.O. (2024). Probing the Scientific-Sociological Discourse on Distance Education. Habitus, 63, 44-49.
Dryden-Peterson, S., Adelman, E., Bellino, M.J., Chopra, V. (2019). The Purposes of Refugee Education: Policy and Practice of Including Refugees in National Education Systems. Sociology of Education, 92 (4), 346-366.
Bourdieu, P. (2018). Social Space and the Genesis of Appropriated Physical Space. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res., 42, 106-114.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J.G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.
Sewell, W.H. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98 (1), 1-29. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2781191
Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C. (1964). Les héritiers. Les étudiants et la culture. Paris: Edition de Minuit.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. Garden city, New York: University of Oklahoma. URL: https://monoskop.org/images/1/11/Polanyi_Michael_The_Tacit_Dimension.pdf
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. URL: https://www.asecib.ase.ro/mps/Bandura_SocialLearningTheory.pdf
Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal Childhoods. Class, Race, and Family Life. Second edition. Berkeley. Los Angeles. London: University of California Press.
Humeniuk, V. (2022). Learner agency in the context of innovative learner environment: its conceptualization and theoretical basis. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 1, 144-164 [in Ukrainian]