Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Paradigmatic shift studying in the globalization of the social reality

172
4
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

In the article paradigmal changes that take place in sociological science in a globalizing society. Particular attention is drawn to features of global sociology paradigmal shift to understanding the present and future development of society, its essence. It is noted that the transition from the world of nation states to a cosmopolitan world order leads to a change of priorities: the shift from the priority of traditional international law to the priority of human rights.

  1. Zborovskii, G.E. (2008). Metaparadigmalnaya model teoreticheskoi sotsiologii. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 4, 6 [in Russian]

  2. Kachanov, Yu.L. Prostranstvo – vremya, sotsialnyi mir i sotsialnaya realnost. URL: //http// www.isras. ru/files/31036-Sages.Katchanov.02.pdf [in Russian]

  3. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  4. Bek, U. (2008). Kosmopoliticheskoe mirovozzrenie. Moskva [in Russian]

  5. Kravchenko, S.A. (2009). Dinamika sotsiologicheskogo myshleniya i voobrazheniya. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 8, 14-24 [in Russian]

  6. Marten, D., Metszher, Zh-L., Pier, F. (2005). Sotsiolohiia hlobalizatsii. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim KM Akademiia [in Ukrainian]

  7. Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjunction and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. In M. Featherstone (Ed.), Global Culture, Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity (pp. 295-310). London: Sage.

  8. Vann Woodward C. (1998). Meanings for Multiculturalism. In A.M. Melzer, J. Weinberger, M.R. Zinman (Eds.), Multiculturalism and American Democracy (p. 55). Lawrence.

  9. Berger, P.L. (2000). Four Faces of Globalization. In P.  O’Meara, H.D. Mehlinger, M. Krain (Eds), Globalization and the Challenges of a New Century (p. 419). Bloomington and Indianapolis.

  10. Beck, U. (2000). The cosmopolitan perspective sociology of the second age of modernity. British Journal of Sociology, 51, 1, 79-105.

  11. Kumar, K. (2007). Global civil society. European Journal of Sociology, 48, 3, 413-434.

  12. Lukman, T. (2000). Germenevtika kak sotsiologicheskaya paradigma? In Sotsialnye protsessy na rubezhe vekov: fenomenologicheskaya perspektiva (p. 15). Moskva: MGIMO [in Russian]

  13. Berger, P., Lukman, G. (1995). Sotsialnoe konstruirovanie realnosti. Moskva: Medium [in Russian]

  14. Lukman, T. (2000). Planirovanie obshcheniya i intersubektivnoe prisposoblenie perspektiv kommunikativnykh zhanrov. In Sotsialnye protsessy na rubezhe vekov: fenomenologicheskaya perspektiva (p. 30). Moskva: MGIMO [in Russian]

  15. Lukman, T. (2000). Nekotorye problemy sovremennykh plyuralisticheskikh obshchestv. In Sotsialnye protsessy na rubezhe vekov: fenomenologicheskaya perspektiva (p. 8-9). Moskva: MGIMO [in Russian]

Full text