Development barriers in Ukrainian society and prospects for modernization: peculiarities of values or poverty trap?


The article aims to answer the question whether peculiarities of Ukraine’s population values prevent development of Ukrainian society during a period of independence and what should be done for its successful modernization. Based on the longitudinal data of the World Values Survey (WVS), the European Values Study (EVS) 1990’s – 2010’s as well as the data of the Research Institute of Credit Suisse Group the article demonstrates that high levels of poverty and social inequality are barriers for the development of Ukraine and impede the spread of emancipatory post-materialist values among the population. Application of modernization and value change model, which was developed by R. Inglehart et al., indicates absence of substantial value cleavage in Ukraine. Also the relationship between value orientations and paternalist expectations of the population is not observed.

It is found that despite the fact that there are fewer people who share emancipatory values compared to other East European countries, Ukraine, nevertheless, also encounters a latent fundamental shift from traditional materialist value priorities towards emancipatory post-materialist orientations. Yet, Ukraine is poorer and has significantly more unequally distributed wealth than the rest of neighboring countries. Based on the research results one can predict that the increase of well-being and a corresponding rise in a sense of existential security among the population will accelerate the change of values that will create opportunities for civic participation and more effective control over the state institutions. Discovered significance of historical effect in value change leads to a substantial elaboration of the existing modernization model.

The efforts of national government, local authorities, international organizations, civil society should be directed at assistance to Ukrainian people in becoming capable social agents and escaping “the poverty trap”. Thus, the purposeful and competent policy of Ukrainian government, true institutional reforms, restriction of “crony capitalism” rent-seeking practices and social inequality reduction provide a chance to modernize Ukrainian society successfully.

  1. Krasil’shchikov, V. (2002). Latin America today – Russia tomorrow (optimistic version of Russia’s future). Mir Rossii – Universe of Russia, 11 (1), 57-96 [in Russian].

  2. Chuanqi, H. (2011). China modernization report outlook (2001–2010). Moscow: Ves’ Mir [in Russian].

  3. Savelyev, Yu. (2012). Sociology in a Quest for the Essence of Modernity: Systematization of Theories of Modern Society and Modernization. Sotsiolohiia: teoriia, metody, marketynh – Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 3, 45-67 [in Ukrainian].

  4. Human Development Report 2014. (2014). Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience: United Nations Development Program. New York: UNDP. URL:

  5. Savelyev, Yu. (2011). European integration and trends of development of Eastern European borderland. Proceedings of National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy”, 122, 71-79.

  6. World Economic Outlook DB. (2014, October). International Monetary Fund. URL:

  7. Human Development Report 2011. (2011). Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All development: United Nations Development Program. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. URL: http://

  8. North, D., Wallis, J.J., Weingast, B.R. (2009). Violence and social orders: a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  9. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.A. (2005). Institutions as Fundamental Determinants of Long-Run Growth. In Ph. Aghion, S.N. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth (pp. 386-472). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  10. Sala-i-Martin, X., Bilbao-Osorio, B., Blanke, J., Drzeniek Hanouz, M., Geiger, Th. (2011). The Global Competitiveness Index 2011–2012: Setting the Foundations for Strong Productivity. In K. Schwab, X. Sala-i-Martin (Eds.), The Global Competitiveness Report 2011–2012 (pp. 3-49). Geneva: World Economic Forum. URL:

  11. Dubrovskii, V., Shirmer, Ya., Greivs-Tretii, W., Golovakha, E., Gavan, A., Pavlenko, R. (2010). The driving forces for unwanted reforms: lessons from the Ukrainian transition period. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing – Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 1, 106-127 [in Russian].

  12. Shestakovskyi, O.P., Bilous, Ye.V. (2015). Basic cultural features of the Ukrainian society and the possibility for their use for socio-economic development. Kyiv. URL: [in Ukrainian].

  13. Gritsak, Ya. (2014). 26th percent or how to overcome history. Kyiv: Fond Poroshenka [in Ukrainian].

  14. Ryabchuk, M. (2015). Two Ukraine: is this the end of ambivalence? Krytyka – Krytyka, 1-2. URL: [in Ukrainian].

  15. Inglehart, R., Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  16. World Value Survey Wave 6 2010-2014. Official Aggregate v.20150418. World Values Survey Association. Aggregate File Producer: Asep/JDS, Madrid Spain. URL:

  17. Savelyev, Yu. (2014). Modernization and Variations in Emancipative Values in European Societies in 1995-2008: Test of Inglehart’s Socialization Hypothesis. Higher School of Economics Research Paper, WP BRP 48/SOC/2014.

  18. World Value Survey 1981-2008 official aggregate v.20090901. (2009). World Values Survey Association. Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS. Madrid. URL:

  19. European Values Study 1981-2008, Longitudinal Data File. (2011, December 30). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, Germany, ZA4804 Data File Version 2.0.0.

  20. Human Development Report 2009. (2009). Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development: United Nations Development Program. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. URL: http://

  21. The Credit Suisse Global Wealth Databook. (2015). Zurich: Credit Suisse Research Institute. URL:

  22. Savelyev, Yu. (2015). Cohort Analysis and a Problem of Differentiating the Components of Social Change: Method of Linear Decomposition of a Trend. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya – Sociological Studies, 10, 130-135 [in Russian].

  23. Savelyev, Yu. (2016). Decomposition of Value Change in European Societies in 1995–2008: Test of Modernization Model and Socialization Hypothesis. Sociológia, 48, 3, 267-289.

  24. Balakireva, O.M., Heyets, V.M., Sidenko, V.R., Golovakha, Ye.I., Shynkaruk, L.V., Shestakovskyi, O.P., Nour, A.M., Savelyev, Yu.B., Sereda, Yu.V., Golovenko, V.A., Levin, R.Ya., Sokurianska, L.G. (2014). The value component of modernization processes in contemporary society of Ukraine. Kyiv: The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute for Economics and Forecasting  [in Ukrainian].

  25. Savelyev, Yu. (2014). Value Foundations of Active Civic Engagement as an Expression of Social Inclusion in the Modernization Process. Ukr. socìum – Ukrainian society, 1 (48), 66-77 [in Ukrainian].

  26. Savelyev, Yu. (2014). Factors and the relationship of political, civic and social participation in European societies. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing – Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, 3, 56-72 [in Russian].

  27. Savelyev, Yu. (2015). Social Inclusion in the Assessment of Social Quality: Practices of Participation in Ukraine in the 2000s. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Sotsiolohiia – Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Sociology, 6, 5-15 [in Ukrainian].

  28. Savelyev, Yu. (2013). Main Types of Public Life Participation in European Countries. Socis – Sociological Studies, 12, 64-71 [in Russian].

Full text