Knowledge and practices: pragmatic constructing of known and unknown (based on materials of legal awareness)

234
1
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

The article carries out theoretically, methodologically and empirically grounded conceptualization of the connection between knowledge and practices from the point of view of the design of the known and unknown in practices and action. The author analyzes concepts of D. Hume, J. Dewey, E. Husserl, A. Schütz, A. Lefebvre, trying to conceptualize the connection between practices and knowledge. On the other hand, he offers his own concept of knowledge protocols, which is based on the development of L. Wittgenstein, P. Sztompka, P. Bourdieu ideas. The correlation of the protocols with each other, as well as with the action and the actor is demonstrated.

It is proved from the standpoint of the sociology of knowledge that the main factor of the social actor’s knowledge structure is his life practices (as generally accepted algorithms of action). The example of legal awareness of Kharkov citizens shows the presence of latent factors in general structure of a social actor’s typical knowledge in any society. The relationship between awareness, practical inclusion, knowledge structures, appraisal and emotional relationship is demonstrated. The suitability of the aforementioned latent factors for any sphere of human activity is proved in the presence of analytically distinguished protocols of interaction. It is demonstrated with the example of practical inclusion of justice bodies in everyday life and in practical knowledge of Kharkov inhabitants that the mass consciousness of everyday actors is formed primarily by their practices, legal “being”, direct contacts with the justice bodies – on the one hand, and the universality and relevance of their services – on the other.

The author builds a factorial model, which includes participation in formal practices, everyday realities and vexatiousness. These three factors influence the familiarity and awareness of everyday actors about the organs of justice. At the same time, the author notes that an important part of any knowledge is not only the known (as permissible for comprehension, action, discussion), but also the unknown. It is concluded that the order of organization of knowledge (protocols) is an indispensable element of the functioning of any social order.

  1. Golovakha, E.I., Panina, N.V. (1994). Social madness: history, theory and modern practice. Kyiv: Abrys [in Russian]

  2. Rushchenko, I. (2014). From ‘criminal revolution’ to ‘criminal society’. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing – Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 2, 3-22 [in Russian]

  3. Baranovskii, N. (2013). Socio-legal system of crime prevention: conceptual foundations of the law. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing – Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 4, 79-95 [in Russian]

  4. Vasylieva, T. (2010). The concept of justice in the socio-humanitarian disciplines. Vіsnyk Lvіvskoho natsіonalnoho unіversytetu іmenі Іvana Franka. Serіia sotsіolohіchna – Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Sociology, 4, 77-82 [in Ukrainian]

  5. Atonachchіo, O., Tittl, Ch., Tittl, R. (2009). Morality, self-control and crime. Vіsnyk Lvіvskoho natsіonalnoho unіversytetu іmenі Іvana Franka. Serіia sotsіolohіchna – Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Sociology, 3, 84-101 [in Ukrainian]

  6. Marusiak, T. (2012). The cognitive component of justice sense: an attempt of sociological research. Vіsnyk Lvіvskoho natsіonalnoho unіversytetu іmenі Іvana Franka. Serіia sotsіolohіchna – Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Sociology, 6, 233-243 [in Ukrainian]

  7. Gerasіna, L.M. (2011). Current political and legal practices in socio political space of Ukraine. Ukr. socìum – Ukrainian society, 1, 167-176 [in Ukrainian]

  8. Volkov, V.V., Kharkhordin, O.V. (2008). The practice theory. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of European University in Saint-Petersburg [in Russian]

  9. Volkov, V.V. (1997). About the concept of practices in the social sciences. Socis – Sociological Studies, 6, 9-23 [in Russian]

  10. Shtompka, P. (2009). The focus of attention is everyday life. Socis – Sociological Studies, 8, 3-13 [in Russian]

  11. Hume, D. (1996). A treatise of human nature: being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects. Writings: in 2 vol. Moscow: Mysl’, 2 [in Russian]

  12. Dewey, J. (2010). Custom and Habit. In D.V. Efremenko (Ed.), Interactionism in American sociology and social psychology of the first half of the 20th century. Series: Theory and history of sociology (pp. 84-97). Moscow [in Russian]

  13. Dewey, J. (2002). Society and its problems. Moscow: Ideya-Press [in Russian]

  14. Husserl, E. (2000). Logical investigations. Cartesian meditations. Crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. The crisis of European humanity and philosophy. Philosophy as a rigorous science. Minsk: Kharvest; Moscow: ACT [in Russian]

  15. Schütz, A. (2004). Collected papers: A world luminous in meaning. Moscow: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN) [in Russian]

  16. Lefebvre, H. (2007). The everyday and everydayness. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie – Sociological review, 6, 3, 33-36 [in Russian]

  17. Vakhshtain, V. (2008). ‘Practive’ vs. ‘frame’: alternative research projects of everyday world. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie – Sociological review, 7, 1, 65-95 [in Russian]

  18. Golikov, О.S. (2017). What can and can not be changed in social: to the concept of the protocol (based on the results of qualitative research). Vіsnyk Kharkіvskoho natsіonalnoho unіversytetu іmenі V.N. Karazіna. Serіia ‘Sotsiolohіchnі doslіdzhennia suchasnoho suspіlstva: metodolohіia, teorіia, metody’ – Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Sociologic study of modern society: methodology, theory, methods, 38, 13-19 [in Ukrainian]

  19. D’yakov, A.A. (2011). The theory of practices: social-philosophical value of the concept. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Ser. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika – Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 11, 1, 8-12 [in Russian]

  20. Wittgenstein, L. (1991). On Certainty. Voprosy filosofii – Questions of Philosophy, 2, 67-120 [in Russian]

  21. Wittgenstein, L. (2010). Culture and value. On Certainty. Moscow: AST, Astrel’, Midgard [in Russian]

  22. Sztompka, P. (1996). Sociology of social change. Moscow: Aspekt Press [in Russian]

  23. Boltanski, L., Thevenot, L. (2000). Sociology of critical ability. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii – The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 3, 3, 66-83 [in Russian]

Full text