Creative leisure practices of modern adolescent youth: specificity, function, manifestation

13
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

The article dwells upon the views on the leisure phenomenon in the Ukrainian and foreign researchers’ works such as K. Marx, R. Stebbins, S. Kuzmenkova, S. Sukhova, V. Arbenina, E. Sokolov, Yu. Streltsov, R. Popov. Author suggests definition of “leisure” and “creative leisure practices”. Papers considers classes of leisure are based on the nature of leisure activities (active/passive, creative/consumer), place of their conducting (home/out-of-home), time classes (daily/holiday), functions (recreation, development, entertainment, etc.), number of individuals (individual, collective, mass, etc.) Classification of creative leisure is given. The results of multidimensional scaling, which revealed differences in the definition about the essential characteristics of educational and entertaining leisure practices between rural and urban adolescents were depicted. As well as some data obtained in the framework of author’s qualitative research, in particular, on the functions of creative leisure practices of contemporary Ukrainian adolescents, identified by the author, the following ones were revealed: socialization, communication, emotive, function of social affiliation, status enhancement, relax function, development of personal skills, self-expression and self-professionalization. It was emphasized that creative collective leisure practices is a factor and at the same time a manifestation of a polyfigural leisure culture, which is a significant factor in the relations development inside and between generations. The conclusion is made on the need to create conditions for improving the cultural and leisure infrastructure, the formation of leisure institutions that would be available to various groups of the Ukrainian population, in particular adolescents, regardless of their place of residence and financial status.

  1. Ahamirian, L.V. (2017). Creative leisure practices as a factor in the formation of social subjectivity of rural adolescents: the main approaches to the sociological dimension. Ukrainskyi sotsіolohіchnyi zhurnalUkrainian Sociological Journal, 1-2, 250-256 [in Ukrainian]

  2. Elias, N. (2001). On the process of civilization: sociogenetic and psychogenetic research. Volume 1: Changes in the behavior of the highest layer of people in Western countries. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaia kniga [in Russian]

  3. Elias, N. (2001). On the process of civilization: sociogenetic and psychogenetic research. Volume 2: Changes in society. The project of the theory of civilization. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaia kniga [in Russian]

  4. Dumazedier, J. (1962). Ver une civilization du loisir? Paris: Éditions du Seuil [in French]

  5. Lee, R. (1964). Religion and Leisure in America: A Study in Four Dimensions. Nashville: Abingdon Press [in English]

  6. Kaplan, M. (1960). Leisure in America: A Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley & Sons [in English]

  7. Kelly, J.R. (1982). Leisure. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall [in English]

  8. Burck, G. (1972). There’ll be less leisure than you think. In M.N. Hormachea, C.R. Hormachea (Eds.), Recreation in modern society (pp. 336-351). Boston: Holbrook Press [in English]

  9. De Grazia, S. (1962). Of Time, Work, and Leisure. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund [in English]

  10. Shivers, J.S. (1981). Leisure and recreation concepts: a critical analysis. Boston: Allyn and Bacon [in English]

  11. Neulinger, J., Breit, M. (1969). Attitude dimensions of leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 1, 255-261 [in English]

  12. Marx, K., Engels, F. (1969). Writings, 2, 46, 2 [in Russian]

  13. Stebbins, R.A. (2015). Serious leisure: A perspective for our time. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction [in English]

  14. Sedova, N.N. (2009). Leisure activity of citizens. SocisSociological Studies, 12, 56-59 [in Russian]

  15. Jenkins, J.M., Pigram, J.J. (2003). Encyclopedia of Leisure and Outdoor Recreation. London and New York: Routledge [in English]

  16. Kuz’menkova, S.P., Sukhova, E.E. (2017). The structure of student youth leisure (according to the results of a survey among students in Smolensk universities). Bulletin of Science and Practice, 11, 462-468 [in Russian]

  17. Dashkovskaya, O.D. (2009). Organization of leisure activities. Yaroslavl: P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University [in Russian]

  18. Arbenina, V.L. (2000). Free time of student youth: trend changes in the structure and content (based on research materials of the 1970s-1990s). Metodolohіia, teorіia ta praktyka sotsіolohіchnoho analіzu suchasnoho suspіlstvaMethodology, theory and practice of sociological analysis of modern society, 258-264 [in Russian]

  19. Sokolov, E.V. (1977). Leisure time and leisure culture. Leningrad: Leizdat [in Russian]

  20. Streltsov, Yu.A. (2002). Leisure Culturology. Moscow: Moscow State Art and Cultural University [in Russian]

  21. Popov, R.S. (2007). Formation of the national-cultural identity of the adolescent’s personality under the conditions of an amateur creative work. Saint Petersburg [in Russian]

  22. Gergilov, R.E. (2007). The theory of civilization N. Elias: criticism and prospects. Voprosy kul’turologiiVoprosy kul’turologii, 5, 16-19 [in Russian]

  23. Mid, M. (1988). Culture and the world of childhood: selected works. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian]

Full text