Typification of representative philosophical and religious perceptions of Ukrainian internet audience

31
4
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

The article aims to identify the particularities of philosophical and religious thinking inherent in the social network audience of Ukraine. Discourse analysis was chosen as the primary method to analyse a set of posts in the form of quotes with accompanying visual components and comments to them that were posted on “Facebook” in 2020 on the pages of public groups “Ukraine is Free World”, “For Ukraine”, “Dialogue.UA” and private groups “Ukrainians Global Network”, “Ukraine is You”, “Ukraine Onlineツ. The author analysed a total of 630 posts with God’s obligatory explicit or implicit component (The Higher Power), which bring out the existential issues of life, raison d’être, human values. The meaning of life is increasingly prominent in the philosophical and religious discourse of the Ukrainian sector of social networks. The idea of the meaning of life is presented on two levels: ideological and social. At the worldview level, ideas about the meaning of life are concentrated in the systemic principle: “Freedom is worth dying for”. At the social level, ideas about the meaning of life are concretised in the following concepts: socio-demographic, aesthetic, religious, hedonistic, hygge, success. The next most common issue is a subject of love understood by the Ukrainian audience of social networks as a system of traits: an active position with the other, value-based principles of a code of conduct, the meaning-making basis for self-realisation, recognising and acceptation the humanity of others, orientation on vital activity, goodwill, and unity, overcoming loneliness, a mode of self-determination. The subjects of time, different issues related to dying and death are ranked last. The tendency of philosophical and religious thinking has shaped the Ukrainian sector of social networks. It has the following special features: 1) view of the world and personal choice of life strategies is based on first-hand knowledge; 2) absence of abstract, unrealistic considerations; 3) strong link with a particular socio-cultural context; 4) focus on solving problems related to anthropological dimensions of philosophising: man as a unique being, the place of man in the world and his role in the processes of being, freedom and responsibility, time as a characteristic of human.

  1. Vladimirova, T.E. (2019). Existential picture of being as an actual research paradigm. Voprosy psikholingvistiki – Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2 (40), 41-52 [in Russian]

  2. Savelyuk, N. (2015). Psycholinguistic Features of Religious Discourse (Theoretical Aspect). East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2 (1), 124-133 [in Ukrainian]

  3. Kompantseva L.F. (2008). Internet linguistics: cognitive-pragmatic and linguacultural approaches. Lugansk: Znanie [in Russian]

  4. Savelyuk, N. (2017). The Psychology of Understanding of Religious Discourse. Kyiv: KNT [in Ukrainian]

  5. Petrushkevych, M. (2018). Religious Communication in the Context of Mass Culture. Ostroh: Publishing house of the National University of Ostroh Academy [in Ukrainian]

  6. Zhurbenko, K.V. (2016). New media as an object of sociological study. Grani, 7, 90-95 [in Ukrainian]

  7. Campbell, H. (2013). Religion and the Internet: A microcosm for studying Internet trends and implications. New Media & Society, 15, 5, 680-694.

  8. Hjarvard, S. (2011). The mediatisation of religion: Theorising religion, media and social change. Culture and Religion, 12 (2), 119-135.

  9. Lövheim, M. (2014). Mediatisation and religion. In Mediatization of Communication (pp. 547-571). Berlin, Boston, MA: De Gruyter.

  10. Hart, C., Cap, P. (Eds.). (2014). Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Bloomsbury.

  11. Grimshaw, A. (2003). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14 (3), 416-418.

  12. Edwards, D. (2005). Discursive psychology. In K.L. Fitch, R.E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 257-273). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  13. Potter, J., Wiggins, S. (2007). Discursive psychology. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 73-90). SAGE Publications Ltd.

  14. Hepburn, A., Potter, J. (2003). Discourse analytic practice. In Qualitative Research Practice (pp. 180-196).

  15. Bochulynskyi, S. (2015). Conceptual and empirical features of discursive construction of social reality. Relihiia ta SotsiumReligion and Socium, 1-2 (17-18), 255-262.

  16. Hepburn, A., Wiggins, S. (2007). Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Everyday Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  17. Bekh, I.D. (2018). Personality on the Path to Spiritual Values. Kyiv, Chernivtsi: Bukrek [in Ukrainian]

  18. Zarubina, T.A. (2004). Philosophical Discourse in the Discourse Subject Matter. Epistemy, 3, 93-101 [in Russian]

  19. Groff, L., Smoker, P. (1996). Spirituality, religion, culture, and peace: exploring the foundations for inner-outer peace in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Peace Studies, 1 (1), 57-113.

  20. Raukas, M. (2000). The Role of Perfections in Inter-Religious Discourse. Electronic Journal of Folklore, 15, 24-31.

  21. Stetsenko, V.I. (2010). Existentialism as the “philosophy of a man” of the 20th century. Sotsiohumanitarni Problemy Liudyny – Socio-humanitarian Problems of Person, 4, 44-54 [in Ukrainian]

  22. Stetsenko, V., Galuiko, R. (2013). “Human-dimension” of Ukrainian tradition of philosophy ofreligion. Visnyk Natsionalnoho aviatsiinoho universytetu: Filosofiia. KulturolohiiaProceedings of the National Aviation University: Philosophy. Cultural Studies, 2, 67-72 [in Ukrainian]

  23. Usborne, E., Taylor, D. (2010). The Role of Cultural Identity Clarity for Self-Concept Clarity, Self-Esteem, and Subjective Well-Being. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 36, 7, 883-97.

  24. Omarbekova, S.V. (2012). Love as an Existential Potential of Human Existence. Nihznevartovsk: Izdatelstvo Nihznevartovskoho humanitarnoho universiteta [in Russian]

  25. Stoiano, O.O. (2015). The existentials of human being in a philosophical view of Søren Kierkegaard. Grani, 9 (125), 145-150 [in Ukrainian]

  26. Kuchera, T. (2012). The Meaning of Life as an Ethical Issue. Universytetska kafedra, 1, 79-91 [in Ukrainian]

  27. Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 353-375). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  28. Berscheid, E. (2003). The human’s greatest strength: Other humans. In A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 37-47). Washington: American Psychological Association.

  29. Bushansky, V.V. (2017). The existential approach to the conceptualisation of time. Naukovi Zapysky Instytutu Politychnykh i Etnonatsionalnykh Doslidzhen im. I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy – Scientific Messages of I.F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnonational Researches of the NAS of Ukraine, 5-6, 93-124 [in Ukrainian]

  30. Höijer, B. (2011). Social Representations Theory. A New Theory for Media Research. Nordicom Review, 32 (2), 3-16.

  31. Abulkhanova, K.V. (2002). Personal Social Thinking. In Modern Psychology: Status and Prospects of Research (pp. 88–103). Moscow: Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences [in Russian]

Full text