Spatial injustice in the formation of land use territories in united communities


The author revealed the injustices in the territories formation of the united territorial communities (UTC) under the local self-government reform, which are manifested in different, uneven volumes of their land use and the resource basis in general for local socio-economic development. The methodological approach used by the authorities in determining the capacity of united communities in their formation (in terms of compliance with the criteria – the area and the population density), led to the fact that in rural areas with low population density they had to form large UTCs to reach specific parameters by population. The hypothesis that territorially large UTCs are capable is ambiguous: on the one hand, land tenure and land use is a resource for socio-economic development of communities, on the other – in a large area the cost of providing essential services to the population in remote villages increases together with the administrative and other costs. Paper proves that large-scale rural UTCs should become objects of the state support as the “rural areas in unfavourable conditions” under the State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027. The author justifies injustices in the centralization of powers on disposal of land resources. The land decentralization as a transfer of relevant powers to UTC local governments will be finally completed, according to the Decree of the President of Ukraine “On some measures to accelerate reforms in the field of land relations” № 449 from 15.10.2020, which will contribute to orderliness in this area and filling local budgets. It is also advisable within the UTCs to give internal communities the right to dispose of their economic territory’s land resources in these communities’ interests. The paper shows discriminatory aspects of administrative reformatting of 120 voluntarily formed and functioning UTCs, according to the Government’s long-term plans for 2020: by recognizing them as insufficiently capable, they should join other communities or unite into larger UTCs.

  1. Soja, E.W. (2010). In Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  2. Libanova, E. (Ed.). (2012). Sustainable Human Development: Ensuring Justice: A National Report. Uman: Vizavi [in Ukrainian]

  3. Economic efficiency vs social justice: priorities of Ukraine’s development at the stage of overcoming the crisis: collect. monograph. (2019). Kyiv: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]

  4. Kuibida, V.S., Nehoda, V.A., Tolkovanov, V.V. (2009). Regional development and spatial planning: the experience of Ukraine and other member states of the Council of Europe. Kyiv: Kramar [in Ukrainian]

  5. Guiding principles of the sustainable spatial development of the European continent. (2007). URL: [in Ukrainian]

  6. Monitoring of land relations in Ukraine: 2016–2017: statistical yearbook. (2018). Land Transparency. URL: [in Ukrainian]

  7. Melnychuk, A. (2020). Five years of forming a new basic level of ATA: successes and problems of reform in Ukraine: an analytical note. Kyiv: Analytical Center of the All-Ukrainian Association of United Territorial Communities. URL: [in Ukrainian]

Full text