Corporate pension funds in Ukraine: features of formation and development prospects
The purpose of this article is to analyse and evaluate current trends in the development of corporate non-state pension funds, which over the last decade have become the main institutional element of the long-term savings system. Under the influence of demographic changes, increased labour mobility and reforms of state PAYG systems, corporate pension funds have become the main form of accumulative pension provision in many countries around the world. In global practice, they dominate in terms of asset volume and participant coverage in countries such as the Netherlands, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. The main trend in the current development of corporate funds is the transition from defined benefit (DB) schemes to defined contribution (DC) schemes. This transformation is driven by the need to reduce financial risks for employers, increased life expectancy, and a shift in the philosophy of pension responsibility – from a guaranteed income model to a personal investment model. Under a DC scheme, employees enjoy greater transparency, mobility and individual control over their pension assets. Corporate pension funds are increasingly integrating modern digital asset management technologies. The use of automated investment strategies, digital identification, algorithmic risk monitoring and personalised pension planning platforms creates a new quality of interaction between the fund, the employer and the participant. This increases efficiency, reduces administrative costs and allows for the implementation of flexible pension solutions. In a broader context, such processes form the basis of a long-term savings model, in which the institutional stability of a corporate fund is combined with technological innovation, management transparency and personalised investment tools. The transformation of corporate pension systems, particularly in countries with high coverage, creates a powerful segment of institutional investors that plays a critical role in the development of financial markets and economic stability. These processes are extremely important for Ukraine. Given the low level of development of open pension funds, limited institutional investment, and low public confidence in financial institutions, it is the corporate sector that could become the starting point for a national accumulation system. One of the most realistic and quickest ways to launch it is to create corporate, non-state pension funds in large state-owned companies and infrastructure operators: Naftogaz of Ukraine, Ukrenergo, state-owned banks, Ukrposhta, Ukrzaliznytsia, etc. Such corporations have significant personnel structures, stable financial flows and an adequate level of state control, which ensures scalability, transparency and trust at the initial stage of reform. In addition, corporate pension programmes in the public sector can become the basis for the formation of long-term investment capital necessary for the restoration and modernisation of the Ukrainian economy after the war.
Libanova, E.M. (Ed.). (2010). Pension Reform in Ukraine: Ways of Implementation: collective monograph. Kyiv: Ptoukha Institute for Demography and Social Studies NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]
Tkachenko, L. (2017). Pension System and Pension Reform in Ukraine. Kyiv: Friedrich Ebert Foundation. Representative Office in Ukraine. URL: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/ukraine/14044.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Sheliudko, N.M. (Ed.). (2023). The Accumulative Pension System in Ukraine: Socioeconomic Dimension and Protection of Pension Savings. Kyiv: Akademperiodyka [in Ukrainian]
Shevkun, T. (2024). Modernization of the Occupational Pension System of Ukraine on the Path of Rapprochement with the EU. In Results, Prospects and Directions of Convergence of EU countries. Opportunities for Ukraine (pp. 43-45). Kyiv: Razumkov centre. URL: https://razumkov.org.ua/images/2024/09/11/2024_Converg_Issues_UKR_EU_UKR_ENG.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Financial, Social and Legal Aspects of Pension Reform in Ukraine. World Experience and Ukrainian Realities. (2017). Kyiv: Razumkov centre [in Ukrainian]
Barr, N. (2012). Economics of the Welfare State. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barr, N., Diamond, P. (2008). Reforming Pensions: Principles and Policy Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holzmann, R., Palmer, E. (2006). Pension Reform: Issues and Prospects for Non-Financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Holzmann, R., Hinz, R. (2005). Old-Age Income Support in the 21st Century: An International Perspective on Pension Systems and Reform. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth. (1994). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Pensions at a Glance: Asia/Pacific. (2018). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Pensions at a Glance 2023: OECD and G20 Indicators. (2023). Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD Pensions Outlook 2024. (2024). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Private Pensions and Policy Responses to the Financial and Economic Crisis. (2009). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Core Principles of Private Pension Regulation. (2016). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Impavido, G., Tower, I. (2009). How the Financial Crisis Affects Pensions and Insurance and Why the Impacts Matter. IMF Working Paper No. WP/09/151. Washington, DC: IMF.
Chybalski, F. (2011). The Resilience of Pension Systems in Central and Eastern Europe to Financial and Economic Crisis. Journal of Comparative Economic Studies, 7, 35-52.
Stress Testing and Scenario Analysis of Pension Plans. IOPS Working Paper No. 19. (2014). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Occupational Pensions Stress Test 2019. (2019). Frankfurt am Main: EIOPA.
Climate Stress Test for the Occupational Pensions Sector. (2022). Frankfurt am Main: EIOPA.
What can we learn from the Dutch and Swedish pension systems? (2022). Pension Notes, 61. URL: https://www.fiapinternacional.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Nota-de-pensiones-61-Mar-2022-ING.pdf
Pension Markets in Focus 2024. (2024). Paris: OECD Publishing.