Ukrainian war migrants in Slovakia: the experience of civil society-local government cooperation in providing humanitarian and integration assistance 2022–2025

196
11
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

The article analyses the experience of cooperation between the civic sector and local authorities in Slovakia regarding the provision of humanitarian and integration assistance to Ukrainian war migrants during the period 2022–2025. The research draws upon the preliminary results of the project “Best partnership practices of NGOs with local authorities in advocacy Ukrainian refugees’ issues”, implemented by the International Institute of Education, Culture and Diaspora Relations (MIOK) with the financial support of the International Visegrad Fund. It is further supplemented by empirical observations of the activities of Slovak non-governmental organisations covering the subsequent period from the summer of 2024 to the autumn of 2025. The study examines the dynamics of migration processes to Slovakia since the onset of the full-scale invasion according to quantitative, age-related, and gender-based criteria. The state’s response and the role of civil society regarding the events in Ukraine are outlined. Furthermore, the legal and regulatory framework for granting temporary protection status to newly arrived Ukrainians is investigated. The paper presents examples of partnership projects implemented through interaction between municipalities, civic associations, and (where applicable) international bodies. The author operationalises the concept of “cooperation between state and non-state institutions” through a series of concepts, allowing this interaction to be viewed as a form of crisis governance. Drawing on the activities of organisations such as People in Need, the Human Rights League, Equita, MEMO 98, and CVEK, the study demonstrates how partnerships with local and regional authorities facilitated the institutionalisation of humanitarian support and the transition from short-term responses to sustainable integration practices. It is concluded that this format of cooperation, whilst not the sole mechanism for assisting migrants, is characterised by the highest level of inclusivity, as it ensures broader engagement of state, civic, educational, religious, and international actors. The author notes that the Slovakia’s experience represents an effective model of multi-level governance, combining the institutional stability of the state with the flexibility of the non-governmental sector. This may serve as a reference point for other countries when formulating social integration policies regarding forced migrants, not limited to those from Ukraine.

  1. Best partnership practices of NGOs with local authorizes in advocacy Ukrainian refuges’ issues. Lviv: Publishing House of Lviv Politechnic National University, 2024. URL: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/visegrad_eng-2-1.pdf

  2. Ukraine Refugee Situation – Data Explanatory Note. Operational Data Portal. (2025). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

  3. Beneficiaries of temporary protection at the end of the month by citizenship, age and sex – monthly data. (2025). Luxembourg: Eurostat.

  4. Kliuchkovska, I., Pyatkovska, O., Dolinska, O., Hnatiuk, V. (2024). Best partnership practices of NGOs with local authorities in advocacy Ukrainian refugees’ issues. Lviv: NGO International institute of education, culture and diaspora relations [in Ukrainian]

  5. Atamanenko, A., Avhustiuk, M. (2023). Forced migration from Ukraine during the Russian Ukrainian war: impact on the EU and Ukraine. Nowa Polityka Wschodnia, 38 (3), 38-59.

  6. Maidanik, I. (2023). The forced migration from Ukraine after the full scale Russian invasion: dynamics and decision making drivers. European Societies, 26 (2), 469-480.

  7. Malynovska, O. (2022). Migration of Ukrainians to Slovakia: trends and prospects. Demography and Social Economy, 47 (1), 70-87 [in Ukrainian]

  8. Schweiger, R. (2024). The role of non-state actors and cities in global migration and refugee governance. In M. Murray Svidroňová (Ed.), Non-Governmental Organizations – Role and Performance in Turbulent Times (Chapter 1). London: IntechOpen.

  9. Murray Svidroňová, M. (Ed.). (2024). Non-Governmental Organizations – Role and Performance in Turbulent Times. London: IntechOpen.

  10. Brozmanová Gregorová, A., Bambúch, F., Šolcová, J. (2024). The Role of the Non-Governmental Organisations and Volunteers in Organising Support for Ukrainian Refugees: The Case Study from Slovakia. In M. Murray Svidroňová (Ed.), Non-Governmental Organizations – Role and Performance in Turbulent Times (Chapter 3). London: IntechOpen.

  11. Seberíni, A., Lacová, Ž., Gubalová, J., Murray Svidroňová, M. (2024). The Challenges of Ukrainian Refugees in Slovakia – Labour Market Integration Aspects with the Help of NGOs. In M. Murray Svidroňová (Ed.), Non-Governmental Organizations – Role and Performance in Turbulent Times (Chapter 2). London: IntechOpen.

  12. Klamár, R., Polačková, A., Bednárová-Gibová, K., Michalko, M. (2024). Eastern Slovak Responses to the Ad Hoc Influx of Refugees from Ukraine: A Case Study of Refugee Assistance by the University of Presov in the Context of Emotionality. In S.D. Brunn (Ed.), Geography of Time, Place, Movement and Networks (pp. 75-106). Cham: Springer.

  13. Šveda, P., Štefková, M. (2025). From Chaos to Coordination: The Evolution of Refugee Support in Slovakia Post-Ukraine Invasion. In M. Dziekońska, K. Luczaj (Eds.), Assistance to Ukrainian War Refugees in Central Europe (2022-2024) (pp. 51-73). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

  14. Sharry, F. (2000). NGOs and the future of the migration debate. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 1 (1), 121-130.

  15. Guogis, A., Gudelis, D., Stasiukynas, A. (2008). The importance of the NGO–municipal relations in developing local democracy. A case study of two Lithuanian municipalities. International Review on Public and Non-profit Marketing, 5 (1), 15-33.

  16. Jelínková, M. (Ed.). (2023). Local Migrant Integration Policies and Their Structural Mechanisms. A Comparative Study of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Germany and Belgium. Prague: Karolinum Press.

  17. Bargerová, Z. (2023). Legislative Setting and Strategic Grounding of Migrant Integration Policies in Slovakia. In M. Jelínková (Ed.), Local Migrant Integration Policies and Their Structural Mechanisms. A Comparative Study of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Germany and Belgium (pp. 56-88). Prague: Karolinum Press.

  18. Soltész, B. (Ed.). (2021). The role of local governments in the integration of refugees in the V4 countries. Budapest: Menedék Association. URL: https://www.cidob.org/en/publications/role -local-governments-integration-refugees-v4-countries

  19. Karak Vargová, J. (2021). Slovakia. In B. Soltész (Ed.), The role of local governments in the integration of refugees in the V4 countries (pp. 22-27). Budapest: Menedék Association.

  20. Mishchuk, Z., Vlasenko, R. (2023). Ukrainian refugees in Visegrad countries: Societal attitudes and challenges of accommodating people fleeing the war. Bratislava: GLOBSEC.

  21. Moroń, D., Madej, M., Csoba, J. (Eds.). (2025). Humanitarian Aid and Empowerment of Ukrainian Refugees: The Case of Visegrad Group countries: Czechia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia (1st ed.). Routledge.

  22. Ukraine Situation: Regional Refugee Response Plan 2024 (January–December 2024). (2024). Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

  23. Promoting Refugee Integration and Inclusion: Empowering Municipalities Across Europe (Integration Policy Brief, August 2024). (2024). Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Regional Bureau for Europe.

  24. A roadmap to integrating refugees and foreigners in cities. (2023). Bratislava: Centrum pre výskum etnicity a kultúry. URL: https://cvek.sk/en/a-roadmap-to-integrating-refugees-and-foreigners-in-cities-3/

  25. Integrácia ľudí z Ukrajiny: Návrhy riešení. (2022). CVEK, Nadácia Milana Šimečku, Človek v ohrození, Liga za ľudské práva & Mareena. Bratislava: CVEK. URL: https://www.hrl.sk/sk/co-robime/projekty/ukrajina/integracia-ludi-z-ukrajiny-navrhy-rieseni

  26. Slovakia Population. (2025). New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Dadax Ltd, USA: Worldometer.

  27. Beneficiaries of temporary protection by citizenship – per thousand persons – monthly data. (2025). Luxembourg: Eurostat.

  28. Decisions granting temporary protection by citizenship, age and sex – quarterly data. (2025). Luxembourg: Eurostat.

  29. Slovakia. Refworld. Global Law & Policy Database. (2025). Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

  30. Country profiles – Slovakia. (2024). Vatican: Integral Human Development.

  31. Slovakia adopts new strategy for governance of asylum and migration. (2025). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.

  32. Migrant integration in Slovakia: Updates and facts. (2025). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.

  33. Without clear goals and measurable outcomes: Slovakia remains stalled in migrant integration. (2025). Bratislava, Slovakia: Supreme Audit Office of the Slovak Republic.

  34. Memorandum o spolupráci pri riešení mimoriadnej situácie v súvislosti s príchodom veľkého počtu ľudí z Ukrajiny na územie Slovenskej republiky spôsobeným eskaláciou ozbrojeného konfliktu na území Ukrajiny. (2022). Slovakia: Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky. URL: https://www.minv.sk/swift_data/source/rozvoj_obcianskej_spolocnosti/participacia/2022/Konferencia_Na%20spolupraci%20zalezi/Memorandum%20o%20spolupraci%20Ukrajina%20OPS%20verzia%20final%2018.10.2022.pdf

  35. Ansell, C., Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18 (4), 543-571.

  36. Osborne, S. (2010). The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. London: Routledge.

  37. Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

  38. Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian emergency assistance of the United Nations (A/RES/46/182). (1991). New York: United Nations General Assembly.

  39. Humanitarian principles. (n.d.). New York; Geneva: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.

  40. Human Development Report 1994: New Dimensions of Human Security. (1994). UNDP. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  41. Béné, C., Newsham, A., Davies, M., Ulrichs, M., Godfrey-Wood, R. (2014). Review Article: Resilience, Poverty and Development. Journal of International Development, 26 (5), 598-623.

  42. Ager, A., Strang, A. (2008). Understanding Integration: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21 (2), 166-191.

  43. Hooghe, L., Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance. American Political Science Review, 97 (2), 233-243.

  44. A community-based approach in UNHCR operations. (2008). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

Full text