Mythoanalytical conceptualization of leadership in the sociology of the imagination of G. Durand


Paper dwells upon the theoretical and methodological foundations of leadership, considering key approaches and archetypal theories in modern value changes. The author notes the basis of the classical typology of leadership by M. Weber as manifestations of prereflective, emotional and rationalized trust in the leader. The typological foundations of archetypal leadership patterns based on dominant charisma, context and basic needs are identified. The possibilities of applying the basic ideas of the sociology of the depths of G. Durand in modern concepts of leadership are revealed, drawing attention to the problems of interpreting gender archetypes and their synergistic effects as stabilizing attractors. The main provisions of the philosophy of G. Durand are investigated, emphasizing the possibility of overcoming the logocentric worldview prevailing in Western culture and opening the horizons of visualizing living semantic complexes of archetypes and myths. These categories are proposed to be considered as the primary cognitive and emotional assets of leadership to substantiate the sources of the innovative and self-realization potential of modern leaders. The article analyses the peculiarities of applying mythoanalysis in political leadership, which is undergoing modifications under the diurnal and nocturne regimes in heroic, dramatic and mystical narratives. Paper investigates the features of the mythocritical and mythoanalytic method of G. Durand. It is noted that mythoanalysis expands the mythological narrative to the socio-cultural context of an epoch, country, period, universal social practices, building an ideal myth-model even outside of historical time in the eternal return of myth. The conceptual reformatting of the archetypes of gender leadership discourse in the communicative foundations of moral influence is considered. The communicative aspects of leadership in masculine and feminine motives of hunting and caring archetypes are determined.

  1. Inglehart, R., Welzel, C. (2011). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. The Human Development Sequence. Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo [in Russian]

  2. Jung, K.G. (2016). Archetype and symbol. Moscow: Kanon [in Russian]

  3. Durand, G. (1984). Anthropological structures of the imaginary. Paris: Dunod [in French]

  4. Eliade, M. (1998). The myth of the eternal return. Archetypes and repetition. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya [in Russian]

  5. Neumann, E. (1991). The Great Mother: An Analysis of the Archetype. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  6. Mark, M., Pearson, C.S. (2001). The Hero and the Outlaw: Building Extraordinary Brands Through the Power of Archetypes. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  7. Myers-Briggs I., McCaulley M., Quenk N. (1998). MBTI Manual (A guide to the development and use of the Myers Briggs type indicator). Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  8. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

  9. Afonin, E.A., Martynov, A.Y. (2019). Archetype as a source of innovation process. Public manаgement, 3, 28-42.

  10. Donchenko, O., Romanenko, Yu. (2001). Archetypes of social life and politics (deep regulations of psychopolitical everyday life). Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian]

  11. Krymskii, S.B. (2000). Philosophy as the path of humanity and hope. Kyiv: Kurs [in Ukrainian]

  12. Novachenko, T.V. (2013). The archetypal paradigm of the authority of the leader in public administration. Nizhyn-Kyiv: Lysenko M.M. [in Ukrainian]

  13. Weber, M. (1998). Sociology. General historical analysis. Policy. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian]

  14. Neuberger, O. (2002). Lead and let lead: Approaches, results and criticism of leadership research. Stuttgart: UTB [in German]

  15. Kets de Vries, M. (2007). Decoding the Team Conundrum: The Eight Roles Executives Play. Organizational Dynamics, 36, 1, 28-44.

  16. Kets de Vries, M. (2018). Down the Rabbit Hole of Leadership. Leadership Pathology in Everyday Life. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

  17. Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50 (4), 370-396.

  18. Wheatly, M. (1992). Leadership and the New Science: Learning about Organization from an Orderly Universe. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

  19. Durand, G. (1993). The Implication of the Imaginary and Societies. Current Sociology, 41 (2), 17-32.

  20. Durand, G. (1973). Symbolic Imagination. Paris: University Press of France [in French]

  21. Durand, G. (1979). Mythical figures and faces of the work: from mythocriticism to mythoanalysis. Paris: Berg international [in French]