Methodological challenges in assessing realisation of the socio-economic potential of livelihood projects in Ukraine during (post-)war period
This article examines the methodological challenges associated with assessing the socio-economic potential of Livelihood projects in (post-)war Ukraine and identifies methods for evaluating their effectiveness. The article notes that, in a narrow sense, Livelihood projects are designed to meet people’s basic needs and overcome acute humanitarian crises. At the same time, the authors emphasise that the objectives of Livelihood projects can be broader, specifically, supporting households with the potential for business development and scaling up in the future. The essence of the socio-economic potential of Livelihood projects is defined as a set of resources that generate social and economic effects as a result of their implementation. A SWOT analysis of the implementation of Livelihood projects in Ukraine during wartime has been conducted. Stages for the implementation of Livelihood projects are proposed. The authors argue that when assessing the effectiveness of realising the socio-economic potential of Livelihood projects, both methods of social impact and economic efficiency should be used, in accordance with the stages of project implementation, whilst arguing for the necessity of applying the “Outcome Harvesting” methodology as a qualitative approach to assessing social impact, with the aim of identifying, describing, verifying, and analysing changes brought about by activities related to Livelihood projects. The importance of stakeholder management in livelihood projects is emphasised, as it determines the effectiveness of realising the socio-economic potential of business-oriented projects during wartime and post-war periods. The importance of applying design thinking in the planning and implementation of Livelihood projects is highlighted as a methodology focused on finding creative solutions to social problems through a deep understanding of the needs of target groups and the involvement of various stakeholders. The necessity of taking into account the socio-cultural diversity of communities based on global and domestic experience in implementing Livelihood projects is substantiated. The main methodological challenges of assessing the socio-economic potential of Livelihood projects are identified.
Livelihoods and Economic Recovery Assistance in Ukraine. (2024). JERU. URL: https://reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/livelihoods-and-economic-recovery-assistance-ukraine
Pomeroy, R., Ferrer, A.J., Pedrajas, J. (2017). An analysis of livelihood projects and programs for fishing communities in the Philippines. Marine Policy, 81, 250-255.
Food Security & Livelihoods Assessment in Eastern Ukraine, NGCA. (2021). Carlo Cafiero and Firas Yassin (with contribution from Charles Hopkins and Elyse Battistella). FAO. URL: https://fscluster.org/sites/default/files/documents/eastern_ukraine_ngca_food_security_and_livelihood_final_ready_to_print.pdf
Yakubyak, A.V. (2025). Theoretical and Methodological Framework for Evaluating Livelihood Projects: Socio-Economic Aspetcs. In Conceptual Pathways for the Development of Science and Education: materials of the ХІV International Scientific and and Practical Conference. Lviv, 29-30 March, 2025 (pp. 13-15). Lviv: Lvivskyi naukovyi forum [in Ukrainian]
Ukraine & Neighbouring Countries 2022-2024, 2 Years of Response. IOM, UN Migration. URL: https://www.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl486/files/documents/2024-02/iom_ukraine_neighbouring_countries_2022-2024_2_years_of_response.pdf
Ukraine – Fifth Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA5): February 2022 – December 2025. (23.02.2026). World Bank Publications. URL: https://www.undp.org/ukraine/publications/ukraine-fifth-rapid-damage-and-needs-assessment-rdna5-february-2022-december-2025
Ukraine: Impact of the war on agriculture and rural livelihoods in Ukraine – Findings of a nation-wide rural household survey, December 2022. (2022). FAO: Rome.
Review of the OECD DAC criteria for evaluating humanitarian action – Summary Brief. (16.06.2023). ALNAR. URL: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/review-oecd-dac-criteria-evaluating-humanitarian-action-summary-brief-enar
Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2023. Adapting Agriculture to Climate Change. OECD. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2023/10/agricultural-policy-monitoring-and-evaluation-2023_7cc05c6a.html
Regional War on Ukraine – EBRD Resilience Package Resilience and Livelihoods Framework. (2022). European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Ukraine: Project Highlights – Restoring livelihoods and revitalizing rural communities affected by mines and explosive remnants of war (OSRO/UKR/025/WFP). (2025). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. URL: https://reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/ukraine-project-highlights-restoring-livelihoods-and-revitalizing-rural-communities-affected-mines-and-explosive-remnants-war-osroukr025wfp
Van der Giessen, M., Koptsyukh, A., Kodeih, F., Alkhaled, S., Poberezhna, A., Wesselius den Boer, M. (2025). From emergency relief to empowerment: Transitioning government-led social entrepreneurship practices to support Ukrainian refugees. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 24, e00559. 6734.
Bae, B., Choi, S. (2024). The effect of collaborative governance in social startups on social performance: The mediating effect of economic performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10, 3, 100370.
O’Keeffe, P., Goff, R., Cunningham, R., Martin, R., Egan, R., Abubakar, A.B.K., Kuol, A. (2025). ‘Tell me a story’: Understanding African-Australian concepts of health, wellbeing and community. Community Development, 1-19.
Pu, G. (2025). What Constitutes a Successful Livelihood Recovery: A Comparative Analysis Between China and New Zealand. Sustainability, 17 (7), 3186.
Tsynalievska, I., Kontsas, S. (2025). Methodological Basis for Assessing Territorial Cohesion: EU Experience and Priorities for Ukraine in the Context of European Integration. Journal of European Economy, 24 (2), 233-253 [in Ukrainian]
Zaiats, T., Romaniuk, S., Kraievska, H., Diakonenko, O., Sova, O. (2024). Priority areas for the formation of capable territorial communities in Ukraine. Agricultural and Resourse Economics, 10 (1), 135-164 [in Ukrainian]
Shevchenko, I., Ukhova, N. (2025). Advancing European Digital Economic Integration in the Context of Ukraine’s Post-War Recovery. Journal of European Economy, 24 (2), 217-232 [in Ukrainian]
Prysiazhna, T. (2023). Methodical approaches to the assessment of the investment potential of territorial communities. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid, 9, 119-126 [in Ukrainian]
Lopushnyak, G.S., Vasylyk, A.V. (2024). Conceptual foundations of the social projects management. Actual problems of economics, 4 (274), 210-220 [in Ukrainian]
Liubchenko, O.M. (2010). The Socio-Economic Potential of a Region: Concept, Structure, genesis. Formation of a Market Economy, 23, 202-209 [in Ukrainian]
Slobodyanyuk, V. (2025). Economic potential of an enterprise: economic content and components. Economy and Society, 83 [in Ukrainian]
Oriekhova, A.I. (2018). Economic Potential of an Enterprise: Essential Characteristics and Structuring. Economy and Society, 17, 308-313 [in Ukrainian]
Marukhlenko, O.V. (2019). Social potential: the essential aspect. Law and Public Administration, 3 (36), 2, 85-91 [in Ukrainian]
Sokolova, A., Ratoshniuk, T., Маrtynyuk, M., Ratoshniuk, V. (2024). Socio-economic potential of rural areas and communities: economic nature, mission, principles and structure. Modeling the development of the economic systems, 2, 58-68 [in Ukrainian]
Malinovska, О.Ya., Motorniuk, U.I. (2019). Features of functioning of territorial communities and formation of their material and financial support. Economics. Finances. Law, 12 (3), 14-16 [in Ukrainian]
Yehorycheva, S., Tymoshenko, O., Panchenko, A. (2016). The essence and the components of local communities’ financial potential. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid, 8, 11-15 [in Ukrainian]
Hutsol, D., Yakymova, N. (2025). Assessment of the Effectiveness of Social Impact As a Key Tool for Managing Social Enterprises. Empirio, 2 (1), 102-115 [in Ukrainian]
Tomei, G., Terenzi, L., Testi, E. (2024). Using Outcome Harvesting to evaluate socio-economic development and social innovation generated by Social Enterprises in complex areas. The case of BADAEL project in Lebanon. Evaluation and Program Planning, 106, 102475.
Gaworek-Michalczenia, M.F., Sallu, S.M., Gregorio, M., Doggart Di, N., Mbogo, J. (2022). Evaluating the impact of adaptation interventions on vulnerability and livelihood resilience. Climate and Development, 14 (10), 867-883.
Nesterova, S.V. (2018). Methods of the evaluation of the investments efficiency: essence and characteristics. Economy and Society, 19, 1105-1110. URL: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/journals/19_ukr/166.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Potiuk, Y. (2024). Definitions of business scaling in the conditions of foreign economic activities. Economy and Society, 60 [in Ukrainian]
Husieva, Yu.Yu., Kantsevych, M.V. (2014). Identification of Stakeholders in Planning Project to Create Condominiums. Municapal Services, 118, 52-55 [in Ukrainian]
A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide: Includes The Standard for Project Management ANSI/PMI 99-001-2025). (2025, November). Eight edition. USA: Project Management Institute.
Poplavska, O., Kiryanova, O. (2024). Theoretical principles of engineering social projects. Economy and Society, 60) [in Ukrainian]
Nazarie, W.N.F.W.M., Williams, R., Azeemi, H., Thaid, H.A.A., Muhammad, I. (2023). Social crowdfunding project: Do project quality and trust matter? Social and Management Research Journal, 20 (2), 29-39.
Chou, D.C. (2018). Applying design thinking method to social entrepreneurship project. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 55, 73-79.
Raman, R., Alka, T.A., Suresh, M., Nedungadi, P. (2025). Social entrepreneurship and sustainable technologies: Impact on communities, social innovation, and inclusive development. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 4 (3), 100110.
Esteves, A.M., Konstantinidis, A.M., Carroll, B., Gouley, C., Vanclay, F. (2025). Rebuilding project-affected livelihoods using the Graduation Approach. The Extractive Industries and Society, 24, 101757.
Oliviu, M., Andreica, L., Tudor, F. (2025). Using Automation and Artificial Intelligence in the Management of European Social Fund Projects. Procedia Computer Science, 256, 1913-1920.