Psychotherapy in the locus of the sociological and in the optics of the critical: a methodology of meaningfulness of methodical fabrication of meaning
The article outlines a theoretical and methodological framework for the critical analysis of therapy in sociological optics, serving as a foundation for the development of a comprehensive future research framework. Drawing on the works of M. Foucault, G. Deleuze, F. Guattari, G. Agamben, L. Boltanski, and È. Chiapello, the author proposes the sociological conceptualisation of therapy that goes beyond its conventional understanding as an instrument of psychological support. Instead, psychotherapy is approached as a discourse and an agent of power that reproduces specific forms of subjectivity as well as fabrication of senses and meanings. Through a Foucauldian lens, psychotherapy is conceptualised as both a therapeutic discourse and a locus of power in which meaning is constructed. The article emphasises the importance of analysing psychotherapy as a discursive phenomenon, which enables to trace the production of specific regimes of knowledge – particularly how psychotherapeutic discourse structures the understandings of normality and pathology, establishes new modes of interpreting emotional experience, and serves as a space for the realization of mechanisms of power. The paper examines the dual nature of power within the psychotherapeutic discourse as that which constructs social space and is simultaneously constructed by it, operating through the subject – homo oeconomicus – who transforms elements of subjectivity and personal life into economic value. Psychotherapy is demonstrated to encourage the subject to observe, analyse, and regulate themselves, converting emotions, experiences, and suffering into resources for productivity and market efficiency. Particular attention is paid to the dual nature of psychotherapy: it functions both as a technique of the self and a component of the security apparatus that reproduces neoliberal logic within the subject. Thanks to this conceptualisation of psychotherapy, new forms of power become visible – forms that contemporary society often orthodoxly represents as individual freedom or techniques of happiness rather than as explicit modes of exploitation. The approach proposed in this article enables a renewed understanding of the relationship between psychotherapeutic practices and power relations, opening perspectives for further empirical and theoretical research in this field.
Blanchflower, D., Bryson, A. (2024). The global loss of the u-shaped curve of happiness. Global Interdependence Center. URL: https://www.interdependence.org/the-global-loss-of-the-u-shaped-curve-of-happiness/
Urošević, M.A. (2024). Therapy culture and the production of subjectivity in neoliberalism. Filozofija i društvo, 4, 913-932.
Verhaeghe, P. (2007). Chronicle of a Death Foretold: The End of Psychotherapy. Lecture, Dublin, September.
LaMarre, A., Smoliak, O., Cool, C., Kinavey, H., Hardt, L. (2019). The Normal, Improving, and Productive self: unpacking neoliberal governmentality in therapeutic interactions. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 32 (3), 236-253.
Foster, R. (2015). The therapeutic spirit of neoliberalism. Political Theory, 44 (1).
Olivier, B. (2020). The psychopolitics of (and psychotherapy required by) neoliberalism. Psychotherapy and Politics International.
Ptashnyk, O.I., Ptashnyk, S.I., Bilous, S.O. (2025). Emotional state and life orientations of students in conditions of instability: a sociological analysis. Habitus, 71 (2), 19-24 [in Ukrainian]
Dukhlii, P.M., Trofimova, D.O. (2024). The impact of war on the psychological state of Ukrainian citizens: an analysis of empirical data. Habitus, 68 (24), 141-150 [in Ukrainian]
Ivanova, T. (2017). Sociology of Anxiety in the Context of Individualization. Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Sociological Studies of Contemporary Society: Methodology, Theory, Methods, 39, 68-72. URL: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/ssms/article/view/9847 [in Ukrainian]
Kniazieva, O. (2018). The Place of Hope and Worrying in the Structure of Socially Significant Feelings (on the Example of Odessa). Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Sociological Studies of Contemporary Society: Methodology, Theory, Methods, 40, 101-108 [in Ukrainian]
Borodenko, О. (2019). Feeling of Happiness in Self-Assessments of Ukrainians. Visnyk of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Sociological studies of contemporary society: methodology, theory, methods, 41, 41-49.
Yasna, I. (2022). Forms of Contemporary Public Philosophical Discourse. Part 2. Expert Opinion, Practice, Therapy, Leisure. Grani, 25 (3), 16-24 [in Ukrainian]
Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L. (2015). Reflexive Sociology. Kyiv: Meduza [in Ukrainian]
Huft, J. (2022). The history and future of the sociology of therapy: a review and a research agenda. The American Sociologist, 53, 437–464.
Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and Civilization. The history of insanity in the age of reason. New York: Randorn House, Inc.
Foucault, M. (2006). Psychiatric Power Lectures at the Collège de France, 1973-1974. London: Palgrave Macmillan London.
Golikov, A.S. (2018). Fabrication of Order. Knowledge in the Constitution of Social: monograph. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University [in Ukrainian]
Our psychiatric future and the (bio)politics of Mental Health: dialogues with Nikolas Rose. (2020). SciELO Brazil.
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Barthes, R. (1967). Elements of Semiology. London: Jonathan Cape.
Boltanski, L., Chiapello, E. (2007). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collége de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.