(In)equality of opportunity in education and the mechanism of non-reproduction

25
1
Article(ENG)(.pdf)

In this article we would like to discuss, based on the results of empirical studies, the question of monopoly position of educational institutions in the distribution of life chances and the factors that could promote social mobility. The main theoretical focus is on the theory of reproduction and on the new theoretical perspective of non-reproduction. Frequently it is precisely the education system itself, the one that inhibits upward social mobility and serves to preserve and reproduce the existing social order with its inequalities. A child’s path throughout the school can be strongly influenced by its class of origin. This principle underlies the theory of reproduction. However, the theory shows its “blind spots”, this is, when a child doesn’t reproduce its own class and successes an upward transition from the lower class to the higher one. Chantal Jaquet names this process a non-reproduction and tries to work out a theory that could explain how a child can transform itself and avoids falling back into the behavior of its class of origin. From this point of view, some exceptional cases can serve as an excellent observatory to determine the decisive factors of an effective change. That is why we decided to look at a few life stories of “class crosses” in depth, using qualitative methods of analysis. The “class crossers” of our study were students from some middle schools (NMS) in Vienna, who could go to the grammar school (Gymnasium). Our aim was to empirically test some statements of the reproduction theory and of the new non-reproduction theory. For this purpose, we tried to reconstruct those factors, that could explain the success of the “class crossers”. Five cases of transition were analyzed and, as a result, some institutional factors that make it difficult for young people to get to and through the gymnasium were identified. Besides, it was proved that adolescents must deal with them mostly on their own using the resources of the family and activating their personal set of mental and physical skills that Jaquet names “complexion”. Moreover, some perspectives for further research opened up: the choice of profession that could lead to social upward mobility, the role of gender of the students and the educational level of their parents on the school path.

  1. Chien, C.-L., Montjouridès, P., Van der Pol, H. (2017). Global trends of access to and equity in postsecondary education. In Access to higher education: theoretical perspectives and contemporary challenges (pp. 3-32). Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge.

  2. Equity in Education. Breaking down barriers to social mobility. (2018). OECD. Overview and policy implications. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  3. El-Mafaalani, A. (2012). BildungsaufsteigerInnen aus benachteiligten Milieus. Wiesbaden: Springer VS [in German]

  4. Bremer, H. (2012). Die Milieubezogenheit von Bildung. In Handbuch Bildungssoziologie (pp. 829-846). Wiesbaden: Springer VS [in German]

  5. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Die Konservative Schule. In Wie die Kultur zum Bauern kommt. Über Bildung, Klassen und Erziehung (pp. 25-52). Hamburg: VSA [in German]

  6. Roth, T., Siegert, M. (2016). Does the Selectivity of an Educational System Affect Social Inequality in Educational Attainment? Empirical Findings for the Transition from Primary to Secondary Level in Germany. European Sociological Review, 32 (6), 779-791.

  7. Spiegler, T. (2018). Resources and requirements of educational upward mobility. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 13, 6. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2018.1425131?scroll=top&needAccess=true

  8. Bohnsack, R., Nentwig-Gesemann, I., Nohl, A.-M. (2007). (Hrsg.): Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. Opladen: VS.

  9. Kramer, R.-T. (2011). Abschied von Bourdieu? Perspektiven ungleichheitsbezogener Bildungsforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften [in German]

  10. Erler, I. (2007). Die Illusion der Chancengleichheit. In Keine Chance für Lisa Simpson? Soziale Ungleichheit im Bildungssystem (pp. 39-47). Wien: Mandelbaum Verlag [in German]

  11. Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.

  12. Hauschild, K., Gwosć, C., Netz, N., Mishra, S. (2015). Social and Economic Conditions of Student Life in Europe. Synopsis of indicators. Eurostudent V 2012-2015. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann Verlag [in German]

  13. Gofen, A. (2009). Family Capital: How First-Generation Higher Education Students Break the Intergenerational Cycle. Family Relations, 58 (1), 104-120.

  14. King, V. (2006). Ungleiche Karrieren. Bildungsaufstieg und Adoleszenzverläufe bei jungen Männern und Frauen aus Migrantenfamilien. In V. King, H.-Ch. Koller (Eds.), Adoleszenz – Migration – Bildung. Bildungsprozesse Jugendlicher und Erwachsener mit Migrationshintergrund (pp. 27-46). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften [in German]

  15. London, H.B. (1989). Breaking Away: A Study of First-Generation College Students and Their Families. American Journal of Education, 97 (2), 144-170.

  16. Raiser, U. (2007). Erfolgreiche Migranten im deutschen Bildungssystem – es gibt sie doch. Berlin: LIT Verlag.

  17. Jackson, B., Marsden, D. (1966). Education and the Working Class. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

  18. Solga, H. (2005). Meritokratie – die moderne Legitimation ungleicher Bildungschancen. In Institutionalisierte Ungleichheiten. Wie das Bildungssystem Chancen blockiert (pp. 19-38). Weinheim/München: Juventa Verlag [in German]

  19. Bell, D. (1994). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. In Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective (pp. 686-697). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  20. Gomolla, M., Radtke, F.-O. (2002). Institutionelle Diskriminierung. Die Herstellung ethnischer Differenz in der Schule. Opladen: Leske + Budrich [in German]

  21. Jaquet, Ch. (2018). Zwischen den Klassen: Über die Nicht-Reproduktion sozialer Macht. Göttingen: Konstanz University Press [in German]

  22. Bisanti, F., Burak, O., Mihailova, M. (2019). Jugendliche Lebenswelten. Der Weg in/durch das Gymnasium. Wien [in German]

Full text