Representations of servicewomen by the Ukrainian media during the Russo-Ukrainian war

1K+
73
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

The study aims to propose a typology of servicewomen’s images promoted by the Ukrainian media during the Russo-Ukrainian war. Qualitative content analysis was used as a research method. The study was based on 50 articles about women in the Armed Forces of Ukraine published between November 2020 and May 2023. The timeframe was chosen given the event that marked the strengthening of the Ukrainian government’s course to the further development and promotion of gender equality in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, namely the ratification of the National Action Plan for Resolution 1325 – “Women, Peace and Security” for the period up to 2025. The articles were selected based on several keywords: women, the Armed Forces of Ukraine, women in the military, and gender equality. The Russo-Ukrainian war has given rise to the promotion of various images of female soldiers in the media. The media offers its audience two types of servicewomen images: 1) a conservative image based on the stereotypical perceptions of women; 2) a counter-stereotypical image that rejects clichés and destroys gender stereotypes. The conservative typification of images of servicewomen, as a demonstration of society’s concern about women performing combat missions that contradict traditional ideas of masculinity and femininity, not only reinforces the idea of traditional stereotypical roles of women but also challenges the prospects of participation of women in combat. The multifaceted gender stereotypical images – “Beauty in uniform”, “Model for a glossy magazine”, “First of all a Woman”, “Beloved Woman”, and “Mother” – are permeated by benevolent sexism against women, which has three components: paternalism, gender differentiation, and heterosexual intimacy. The image “Person with special domestic needs” focuses on physiological processes related to the female reproductive system. This content of the image conveys the assumption that women can face an uncomfortable situation when it is challenging to perform the necessary hygienic measures, and this can hinder them from being in the war zone. The counter-stereotypical typification manifested in the “Professional Soldier” and “Rebel” images contribute to overcoming stereotypical perceptions and shaping a society where women have equal rights and opportunities to realize these rights. Creating the “Professional Soldier” image, the media assume that the main prerequisite for a professional warrior is not gender but professional competencies. The “Rebel” image of a servicewoman represents a new generation of women who openly declare their right to be whatever they want and join the military to eliminate the “weaker sex” stereotype. The emphasis on masculinity in the “Rebel” image indicates that, despite the increase in women, the media still perceives the army as a masculine organization. Both conservative-stereotypical and counter-stereotypical images, such as “Sexual Object” and “Lesbian”, can be created for purely commercial interests or as a marketing ploy to attract the audience.

  1. Llanos, B., Nina, J. (2011). Election Coverage from a Gender Perspective: A Media Monitoring Manual. Sweden, Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. URL: https://recef.org/wp-content/uploads/FEM-ELEC-ONU-IDEA-monitoring-medias-genre-EN.pdf

  2. Kaplan, E.A. (2000). Feminism and Film. Oxford University Press.

  3. Isaksson, C. (2019). Integrating Gender Perspectives at NATO: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back. In R. Egnell, M. Alam (Eds.), Women and Gender Perspectives in the Military: An International Comparison (pp. 225-252). Washington: Georgetown University Press.

  4. Chen, M., Jiang, Q. (2019). Research on the Female Image-Building in Mass Media. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 315, 285-288.

  5. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

  6. Luo, X.H. (2022). Cultural Representation of Female Images in Advertising. Open Access Library Journal, 9, 1-20.

  7. Bonsu-Owu, H. (2019). A Three Step Approach Analysis of the Portrayal of Images of Women in three Ghanaian Newspapers: Newsone, Ebony and The Mirror. Athens journal of mass media and communications, 5, 131-156.

  8. Asr, F.T., Mazraeh, M., Lopes, A., Gautam, V., Gonzales, J., Rao, P., Taboada, M., Kehler, A. (2021). The Gender Gap Tracker: Using Natural Language Processing to measure gender bias in media. PLoS ONE, 16 (1), e0245533.

  9. Sharma, B. (2013). Image of Women in Media. SSRN Electronic Journal.

  10. Paynter, K.C. (2011). Gender Stereotypes and Representation of Female Characters in Children’s Picture Books. Doctoral Dissertations and Projects. 464. URL: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/464

  11. Tuchman, G. (2000). The Symbolic Annihilation of Women by the Mass Media. In L. Crothers, C. Lockhart (Eds.), Culture and Politics (pp. 150-174). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  12. Berkowitz, D. (2005). Suicide bombers as women warriors: Making news through mythical archetypes, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82 (3), 607-622.

  13. Sjoberg, L., Gentry, C.E. (2007). Mothers, monsters, whores: Women’s violence in global politics. New York, NY: Zed Books Ltd.

  14. Ross, K., Byerly, C.M. (2008). Women and Media: International Perspectives. John Wiley & Sons.

  15. Holland, S.L. (2006). The dangers of playing dress-up: Popular representations of Jessica Lynch and the controversy regarding women in combat. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92 (1), 27-50.

  16. Just, S.N. (2006). Embattled agencies: How mass mediated comparisons of Lynndie England and Jessica Lynch affect the identity positions available to female soldiers in the US army. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 22 (2), 99-119.

  17. Howard, J.W., Prividera, L.C. (2008). The Fallen Woman Archetype: Media Representations of Lynndie England, Gender, and the (Ab)uses of U.S. Female Soldiers. Women’s Studies in Communication, 31, 287-311.

  18. Kumar, D. (2006). Media, war and propaganda: Strategies of information management during the 2003 Iraq war. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 3 (1), 48-69.

  19. Taylor, A., Hardman, M.J. (2004). War, language, and gender, what new can be said? Framing the issues. Women and Language, 27 (2), 3-19. URL: https://mason.gmu.edu/~ataylor/dvd_project/Readings/War,%20Language%20and%20Gender.pdf

  20. Krepstekies, C. (2010). News Media Representations of Women in the U.S. Military. USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations. URL: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/364

  21. Kostovska, A.V. (2017). Five types of discrimination against women in the media. Zapysky z ukrainskoho movoznavstva – Opera in Linguistica Ukrainian, 24 (2), 51-58 [in Ukrainian]

  22. Kukina, O. (2020). The linguistic image of a woman in the newspaper discourse of Chuhuiv media. Ukrainskyi svit u naukovykh paradyhmakh – Ukrainian world in scientific paradigms, 7, 173-177 [in Ukrainian]

  23. Marcenyuk, T., Gricenko, G., Kvit, A. (2016). “Invisible Battalion”: women’s participation in the anti-terrorist operation (sociological study). Kiev: FOP Klimenko [in Ukrainian]

  24. Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2.

  25. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London: SAGE Publications Inc.

  26. Rolfe, G. (2006). Validity, trustworthiness, and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 304-310.

  27. Selvi, A.F. (2019). Qualitative Content Analysis. In J. McKinley, H. Rose (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 440-452).

  28. Kondracki, N.L., Wellman, N.S. (2002). Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications innutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34, 224-230.

  29. McTavish, D.-G., Pirro, E.-B. (1990). Contextual content analysis. Quality and Quantity, 24, 245-265.

  30. Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

  31. Mayring, P. (2019). Qualitative Content Analysis: Demarcation, Varieties, Developments. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20 (3).

  32. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  33. Planiol, A. (2016). The integration of women in the US military. Études de l’IRSEM, 43. URL: https://www.irsem.fr/data/files/irsem/documents/document/file/2443/Etude_IRSEM_n43_En.pdf

  34. Sasson-Levy, O. (2003). Feminism and military gender practices: Israeli women soldiers in ‘masculine’ roles. Sociological Inquiry, 73 (3), 440-465.

  35. Khraban, T. (2022). Social and communication construction of gender identity bywomen serving in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Sotsialni komunikatsii: teoriia i praktyka – Social Communications: Theory and Practice, 14 (1), 182-195 [in Ukrainian]

  36. Glick, P., Fiske, S.T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (3), 491-512.

  37. Barreto, M., Doyle, D.M. (2023). Benevolent and hostile sexism in a shifting global context. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2, 98-111.

  38. Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275-298.

  39. Taylor, L.D., Setters, T. (2011). Watching Aggressive, Attractive, Female Protagonists Shapes Gender Roles for Women Among Male and Female Undergraduate Viewers. Sex Roles, 65, 35-46.

  40. Brown, M. (2012). A Woman in the Army is still a Woman: Representation of Women in U.S. Military Recruiting advertisements for the all-volunteer force. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 33 (2), 151-175.

  41. Greenwood, D., Lippman, J. (2010). Gender and Media: Content, Uses, and Impact. In J.C. Chrisler, D.R. McCreary (Eds), Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology (pp. 643-669).

  42. Kahalon, R., Shnabel, N., Becker, J.C. (2018). Experimental Studies on State Self-Objectification: A Review and an Integrative Process Model. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1268.

  43. Jeffreys, S. (2007). Double jeopardy: Women, the US military and the war in Iraq. Women’s Studies International Forum, 30 (1), 16-25.

  44. Maninger, S. (2008). Women in Combat: Reconsidering the Case Against the Deployment of Women in Combat-Support and Combat Units. In H. Carreiras, G. Kümmel (Eds), Women in the Military and in Armed Conflict (pp. 9-28). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

  45. Mathers, J.G. (2012). Women and State Military Forces. In C. Cohn (Ed.), Women and War: Contested Histories, Uncertain Futures (pp. 124-145). Polity.

  46. Diamond, L. (2012). The Desire Disorder in Research on Sexual Orientation in Women: Contributions of Dynamical Systems Theory. Archives of sexual behavior, 41, 73-83.

Full text