Visualized values in the social practices of Ukrainian Instagram users

94
7
Article(UKR)(.pdf)

The article is devoted to studying visualized values in the social practices of Ukrainian Instagram users. The authors analyse the specifics of post-semiological and socio-dramatic approaches to studying of the visual content of social networks. It has been suggested that photos and videos may represent 1) conscious values of social actors, which they tend to visualize due to their importance, 2) unconscious values, which are involuntarily projected onto the visualized online behaviour. The paper presents the theoretical substantiation of the need to study the values through visuality analysis. The study of visualized values in the social practices of Ukrainian Instagram users was conducted using R. Inglehart’s theory of postmodernization of values, which describes three value patterns – traditional, modernist, and postmodernist. The study aimed to find out which visualized values dominate in the Ukrainian Instagram pool; to conduct a comparative analysis of male and female value preferences in the visual field of Instagram. The results of quantitative content analysis of 2657 photos of Ukrainian Instagram users are presented. It is noted that modernist and postmodernist values are most often visualized in the social practices of Ukrainian Instagram users (38,8% and 41,8%, respectively); the most popular visualized values in female accounts are glamour, environmentalism, and aesthetic perception of life, and in male – friendship, professional self-development, career, and achievement. It is assumed that the visual field of Ukrainian Instagram presents the social actors’ value preferences which can be both conscious and unconscious. It is emphasized that they can anticipate value changes in real life and latently influence the formation of new value patterns. The conclusion is that the visualized values in the social practices of Instagram users can act as predictors of further value transformations in real social life.

  1. Mirzoeff, N. (1999). An Introduction to Visual Culture. New York: Routledge.

  2. What social networks are the most popular in Ukraine and do we trust them: a survey. (2020, January). R&B Group. URL: https://rb.com.ua/blog/socmerezhi-jak-dzherelo-informacii [in Russian]

  3. How Ukrainians use Facebook and Instagram. (2020, March). PlusOne social impact. URL: https://tech.liga.net/technology/novosti/kak-ukraintsy-polzuyutsya-facebook-i-instagram—issledovanie [in Russian]

  4. Toshchenko, Zh. (2013). Values and value orientations. Sociology thesaurus. Moscow: UNITY-DANA [in Russian]

  5. Sztompka, P. (2007). Visual Sociology. Мoscow: Logos [in Russian]

  6. Foster, H. (Ed.). (1988). Vision and Visuality. Seattle: Bay Press.

  7. Bourdieu, P. (1996). Photography: A Middle-Brow Art. Stanford University.

  8. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.

  9. Hilsen, A.I., Helvik, T. (2014). The construction of self in social medias, such as Facebook. AI & society, 29 (1), 3-10.

  10. Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54 (3), 402-407.

  11. Smith, S., Watson, J. (2014). Virtually me: A toolbox about online self-presentation. In A. Poletti, J. Rak (Eds.), Identity technologies: Constructing the self online (pp. 70-95). Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.

  12. Smith, L.R., Sanderson, J. (2015). I’m Going to Instagram It! An Analysis of Athlete Self Presentation on Instagram. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59 (2), 342-358.

  13. Barnett, C. (2009). Towards a methodology of postmodern assemblage: adolescent identity in the age of social networking. Philosophical Studies in Education, 40, 200-210.

  14. Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  15. Pink, S. (2007). Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media, and Representation in Research. London: Sage.

  16. Back, M.D., Stopfer, J.M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S.C., Egloff, B., Gosling, S.D. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21 (3), 372-374.

  17. Bataeva, E.V. (2012). Flanering and video mania: Modern and postmodern visual practices. Voprosy Filosofii, 11, 61-68 [in Russian]

  18. Bataeva, Е.V., Polyakova, Y.A. (2018). Motive-analysis of TV-advertising visual content. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal – Sociological Journal, 24 (2), 66-89 [in Russian]

  19. Sartre, J.-P. (2001). The Imaginary. A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. Saint Petersburg: Nauka [in Russian]

  20. Nancy, J.-L. (2005). The Ground of the Image. New York: Fordham University Press.

  21. Deleuze, G. (2004). Cinema. The Movement-Image. Moscow: Ad Marginem [in Russian]

  22. Barbatsis, G. (2005). Reception theory. In Handbook of visual communication. Theory, methods, and media (pp. 271-294). New Jersey, Mahwah: Lowrence Erlbaum Associates.

  23. Kress, G., Leeuwen, T. van. (2006). Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge.

  24. Mitchell, W.J.T. (1994). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  25. Sokuryanskaya, L. (2006). Students on the way to another society: value discourse of the transition. Kharkiv: KhNU im. V.N. Karazin [in Russian]

  26. Bevzenko, L. (2007). Life success, values, lifestyles. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 4, 132-151 [in Russian]

  27. Inglehart, R., Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  28. Inglehart, R. (2000). Globalization and postmodern values. The Washington Quarterly, 23 (1), 215-228.

  29. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  30. Berger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Pinguin Books.

  31. Ukraine in World Values Survey 2020. Resume of the Analytical Report. (2020). Kyiv: NGO Ukrainian Centre for European Policy. URL: v2.0https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp

  32. Sokuryanska, L. (2012). “Modernization” and “postmodernization” of students’ value orientations as a factor of the modernization of society. In Methodology, theory and practice of sociological analysis of modern society (pp. 421–427). Kharkiv: KhNU im. V.N. Karazin [in Russian]

  33. Baudrillard, J. (2006). The Consumer Society. Myths and Structures. Moscow: Respublika, Kulturnaya revolyutsiya [in Russian]

  34. Bauman, Z. (1996). From pilgrim to tourist – or a short history of identity. In S. Hall, P. Du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 18-36). New York: Sage Publications, Inc.

  35. Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., Puranen, B. et al. (Eds.). (2020). World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid, Spain, Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. URL: https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV7.jsp

  36. Features of religious and church-religious self-determination of Ukrainian citizens: trends of 2010–2018 (information materials). (2018). Kiev: Razumkov Center. URL: https://razumkov.org.ua/uploads/article/2018_Religiya.pdf [in Russian]

  37. Religion in the life of Ukrainian citizens: what do Ukrainians believe in? (2016). TNS MMI. URL: https://tns-ua.com/news/religiya-v-zhitti-gromadyan-ukrayini-u-shho-viryat-ukrayintsi [in Russian]

  38. DeWall, C.N., Buffardi, L.E., Bonser, I., Campbell, W.K. (2011). Narcissism and implicit attention seeking: Evidence from linguistic analyses of social networking and online presentation. Personality and Individual Differences, 51 (1), 57-62.

  39. Panek, E.T., Nardis, Y., Konrath, S. (2013). Mirror or megaphone? How relationships between narcissism and social networking site use differ on Facebook and Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (5), 2004-2012.

  40. Sheldon, P., Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89-97.

  41. Shane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2018). Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 276-288.

  42. Khodina, E. (2014). Cultural and anthropological aspect of Instagram. Molodoi uchenyiYoung scientist, 21, 738-741 [in Russian]

Full text