The natural and cultural determinants of social tensions in the contemporary European societies


The characteristics of the main directions of the fundamental innovative sociological research, which are orientated to identification the new determinants of social tensions caused by the contradictory practical human attitudes to nature and environment, have been presented in the article – argued that the latest global and regional transformations change the traditional forms of the human cultural influence to nature as the physical reality. Therefore, the sociological research of the cultural integration and differentiation in contemporary European societies, as the social systems of industrial and post-industrial types, open the new cognitive stimulus for the fundamental and applied scientific studies of the new forms of social tensions in the “nature-society” system. Proved that in the contemporary multicultural European societies, the different subcultures arise and coexist in their competitive and contradictory interactions. These subcultures, reflecting the essential humanitarian values, at the same time, produce the critical human attitude to existing social orders. So, the scholars, who study the reasons for the contradictory human attitudes to nature, try to develop conceptual views on the subculture phenomena as the specific sources of the social tensions. Paid attention to the need for the correct identification of the “social tension” concept’s cognitive status, taking into account that this concept is vital for innovative studies in the scientific spheres of sociology, social ecology, and social management.

  1. Burcke, P. (2016). What is cultural history? Moscow: HSE Publishing House [in Russian]

  2. Durand, G. (2015). The symbolic imagination. Paris: PUF [in French]

  3. Lewis, J. (2002). From Culturalism to Transculturalism. Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies, 1, 14-32.

  4. Sorrels, K. (2013). Intercultural communication, Globalization and Social Justice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publ.

  5. Thornton, S. (1997). The Sociologic of Subcultural Capital. In K. Geldner, S. Thornton (Eds.), The Subcultures Reader (pp. 200-212). London, New York: Routlege.

  6. Hebdige, D. (2002). Subculture: The Meaning of Style (new accents). London: Routlege.

  7. Haenfler, R. (2014). Subcultures: The basics. New York: Routlege.

  8. Sudakov, V.I. (2020, January). Archetypes of culture and subculture as the determinants of the social actions and social management. Public management: collection, 1 (21), 286-295.

  9. Singer, M. (2016). Introducttion. In M. Singer (Ed.), A Companion to the Anthropology of Environmental Health (pp. 1-18). Chichester: Wiley, Blackwell.

  10. Dеnnіs, К., Urri, J. (2010). After the car. Kyiv: Tempora [in Ukrainian]

  11. Florida, R. (2019). The New Urban Crisis: How Our Cities Are Increasing Inequality, Deepening Segregation, and Failing the Middle Class. Kyiv: Nash format [in Ukrainian]

  12. Lapina, V.V. (2017, June). Over-consumption archetype globalization as a new source of social conflicts and social tension. Public management, 3 (8), 158-166.

  13. Lapina, V.V. (2018, June). The archetype of consumption and its contradictions in the contemporary European space of economic and social interactions. Public management: collection, 4 (14), 159-170.

  14. Skokova, L. (2018). Cultural practices in modern society: theoretical approaches and empirical dimensions. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian]

  15. Маffesoli, М. (2018). The Time of the Tribes. The Decline of Individualism in the Mass Society. Kyiv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy [in Ukrainian]

  16. Sudakov, V.I., Siryi, Ye.V., Lapina, V.V., Savelyev, Yu.B., Chernykh, H.A., Коndov, K.V., Nаkhаbich, M.A. (2018). Social tension in regional dimensions: problems of theory, methodology and methods of sociological research. Kyiv: Logos [in Ukrainian]