Analytical components of mental mapping in sociological studies of conflicts


The paper focuses on theoretical and methodological achievements in the sociology of conflict, particularly the adaptation and development of mental mapping method. The main objective of the study is to define, characterize and specify the basic analytical components of mental mapping with regard to studying a conflict as a social phenomenon. Mental map is defined as an image or model of outer space gradually formed over time in subject’s consciousness. The method of mental mapping was described as a graphic representation of certain area by informant at researcher’s request. The classical concepts of mental mapping and their application in the studies of conflicts are presented in the historical retrospective. Thus, there is an overview of particular cases of the mental mapping methodology implementation, such as the study of relationships between communication channels and perceptions of dangerous urban areas in Los Angeles, the translocal identity of Polish emigrants’ children in Scotland, the “micro-geography of emotions” of migrant children in Paris and Berlin, the perception of Milan by migrants, the conflict topology imaginations of high school students of Israel and Palestine, spatial projections of social conflicts in Cyprus, North Ireland, Belgium, and Ukraine. Authors suggest theoretical and methodological generalization of the mental mapping of conflicts based on the approach of Jack Gieseking or the “Gieseking matrix” composed of four categories (mechanics of method, graphic elements, narratives of place and personalization), each of which contains a set of analytic components and techniques (a total of 57 units). The paper outlines the methodological specifics of analytical components in mental mapping of conflict, and notes the integrative interdisciplinary potential and the prospects for the development of this method.

  1. Graham, E. (1976). What Is a Mental Map? Area, 8 (4), 259-262.

  2. Veselkova, N.V. (2010). Mental maps of the city: questions of methodology and practice of use. Sociology, 4M, 31, 2-29 [in Russian]

  3. Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

  4. Milgram, S. (2000). Experiment in social psychology. Saint Petersburg: Peter [in Russian]

  5. Switzer, C., McDowell, S. (2009). Redrawing Cognitive Maps of Conflict: Lost Spaces and Forgetting in the Centre of Belfast. Memory Studies, 2 (3), 337-353.

  6. Matei, S.A., Ball-Rokeach, S., Ungurean, S. (2007). Communication Channels, Spatial Stereotyping, and Urban Conflict: A Cross-Scale and Spatio-Temporal Perspective. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 1, 196-203.

  7. Moskal, M. (2010). Visual Methods in Researching Migrant Children’s Experiences of Belonging. Migration Letters, 7 (1), 17-32.

  8. Moskal, M. (2015). ‘When I Think Home I Think Family Here and There’: Translocal and Social Ideas of Home in Narratives of Migrant Children and Young People. Geoforum, 58, 143-152.

  9. Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

  10. Park, R. (1928). Human Migration and the Marginal Man. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 881-893.

  11. Wood, M. (1934). The Stranger: A Study in Social Relationships. New York: Columbia University Press.

  12. Schuetz, A. (1944). The Stranger: An Essay in Social Psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 49 (6), 499-507.

  13. Tiryakian, E. (1973). Sociological Perspectives on the Stranger. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 56 (1), 45-58.

  14. Glazkov, K. (2015). Mental maps: limitations of the method and the image of the ‘stranger’ in a small city. Laboratorium: Journal of Social Research, 7 (3), 106-117 [in Russian]

  15. Besten, den O. (2010). Local Belonging and ‘Geographies of Emotions’: Immigrant Children’s Experience of Their Neighbourhoods in Paris and Berlin. Childhood, 17 (2), 181-195.

  16. Pezzoni, N. (2013). Migrant’s Maps to Explore the Contemporary City. Planum. The Journal of Urbanism, 27 (2), 43-52.

  17. Ben-Ze’ev, E. (2015). Blurring the Geo-Body: Mental Maps of Israel/Palestine. Middle East Journal, 69 (2), 237-242.

  18. Akcali, E. (2010). Reading the Cyprus Conflict Through Mental Maps – An Interdisciplinary Approach to Ethno-Nationalism. In A. Guelke (Ed.), The Challenges of Ethno-Nationalism: Case Studies in Identity Politics (pp. 41-59). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  19. Reuchamps, M., Kavadias, D., Deschouwer, K. (2014). Drawing Belgium: Using Mental Maps to Measure Territorial Conflict. Territory, Politics, Governance, 2 (1), 30-51.

  20. World Migration Report 2018. International Organization for Migration. URL:

  21. Tsimbalyuk, D., Filipeva, Y., Zasipkin, V. (2015, October 21). Odyssey Donbas: mental maps and memories of native places. Ukrainska pravda. URL: [in Ukrainian]

  22. East-Home: inhabitants of the prefrontal line showed. (2019, February 22). URL: [in Ukrainian]

  23. Zlotin, V.J. (2013). The mental map of Lugansk: the image of the city in the minds of students. Bulletin of Odessa National University. Sociology and political science, 18, 2 (1), 267-273 [in Russian]

  24. Gieseking, J. (2013). Where We Go from Here: The Mental Sketch Mapping Method and Its Analytic Components. Qualitative Inquiry, 19 (9), 712‑724.

Full text