Основні тенденції делегітимації політичної влади в сучасній Україні
Досліджуються тенденції делегітимації правлячого режиму в сучасній Україні, розкривається їх зміст та значення. Виходячи з аналізу семи вимірів легітимності державної влади, констатується наявність п’яти делегітимаційних тенденцій.
V Ukrai’ni sposterigajet’sja najbil’she padinnja rivnja demokratii’ z-pomizh krai’n Jevropy. URL: http://newsru.ua/ukraine/30dec2010/ rejtung.html [in Ukrainian]
Vysoc’kyj, O.Ju. (2010). Tehnologii’ legitymacii’ politychnoi’ vlady: teorija ta praktyka. Dnipropetrovs’k: Porogy [in Ukrainian]
Gobbs, T. (1991). Leviafan, ili Materija, forma i vlast’ gosudarstva tserkovnogo i grazhdans’kogo. In V. Sokolov (Ed.), Soch. (pp. 3–731). Moscow: Mysl’ [in Russian]
Kotljar, A. (2011). Ukrai’na posidaje misce. Dzerkalo tyzhnja [in Ukrainian]
Kramer, D., Nurik, R., Vil’son, D., Alterman, E. B’juchy na spoloh: na zahyst demokratii’ v Ukrai’ni: zvit Freedom House shhodo demokratii’ shhodo stanu demokratii’ ta zahystu prav ljudyny v Ukrai’ni. URL: www.freedomhouse.org/images/File/special_reports/Freedom%20House_UKR.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Reputacija Ukrai’ny u sviti girsha, nizh u Bolivii’. Ale krashha, nizh u Izrai’lju, Kytaju ta Rosii’. (2011). Dzerkalo tyzhnja [in Ukrainian]
Reutov, E.V. (2007). Legitimacija regional’noj vlasti v Rossijskoj Federacii: struktura i praktiki. Belgorod: Izd-vo BelGU [in Russian]
Uvaga gromadjan povernulasja do nasushhnyh social’no-ekonomichnyh problem: tyzhnevyj ogljad, 15–21 zhovt. 2011 r. URL: http://cedos.org.ua/en/protestmonitor/33-reports/74–15-21-2011 [in Ukrainian]
Ukrai’na za konkurentospromozhnistju porjad z Botsvanoju i Trynidadom. (2011). Ukr. pravda. URL: www.pravda.com.ua/2011/09/7/6567784/ [in Ukrainian]
Ukrai’na opustylasja na 152-e misce v rejtyngu SB shhodo legkosti vedennja biznesu. (2011). Dzerkalo tyzhnja [in Ukrainian]
Alford, C.F. (2005). Rethinking freedom: why freedom lost its meaning and what can bedone to save it. New York: Palgrave Macmillan [in English]
Beng-Huat Ch. Political Legitimacy and Housing: Stakeholding in Singapore. (1997). New York: Routledge [in English]
Booth, J.A., Seligson, M.A. (2009). The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America: Political Support and Democracyin Eight Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English]
Buchanan, A. (1999). Recognitional Legitimacy and the State System. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 28, 1, 46-78 [in English]
Coicaud, J.-M. (2002). Legitimacy and Politics: A Contribution to the Study of Political Right and Political Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English]
Dalton, R.J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford, NewYork: Oxford University Press [in English]
Dalton, R.J. (1999). Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 57-77). New York: Oxford University Press [in English]
Easton, D.A. (1979). Systems Analysis of Political Life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press [in English]
Klingemann, H.-D. (1999). Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 31-56). New York: Oxford University Press [in English]
Kornberg, A., Clarke, H.D. (1992). Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press [in English]
Lakoff, G. (2006). Whose freedom?: the battle over America’s most important idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux [in English]
Norris, P. (1999). Institutional Explanations for Political Support. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 217-235). New York: Oxford University Press [in English]
Weatherford, M.S. (1992). Measuring Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 86, 1, 149-166 [in English]